Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

10:15
Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging and Force Spectroscopy of Supported Lipid Bilayers
Published on: July 22, 2015
Phase imaging atomic force microscopy in the characterization of biomaterials
1Institute for NanoBiomedical Technology and Membrane Biology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Science Park No.1, Ke Yuan 4th St., Gao Peng Road, Hi-tech Industrial Development Zone, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Journal of Microscopy
|April 14, 2010
Summary
Phase imaging atomic force microscopy primarily reveals surface morphology, not chemical variations, in biomaterials. Specific tapping modes can detect chemical differences in rougher samples by overcoming inherent surface roughness.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Phase imaging atomic force microscopy (AFM) is crucial for biomaterial surface characterization.
- Phase images offer detailed surface properties beyond morphological data.
- Distinguishing chemical from morphological information in phase images remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the primary contributors to phase images in atomic force microscopy.
- To differentiate between morphological and chemical signals in phase imaging of various materials.
- To establish optimal conditions for detecting chemical-dependent phase contrast.
Main Methods:
- Utilized phase imaging atomic force microscopy (AFM) to analyze non-carious human maxillary incisors, microphase-separated polyurethane, and self-assembling peptide nanofibers.
- Examined the relationship between phase signals and surface morphology (peaks and valleys).
- Tested different tapping modes (hard and light) and amplitude set points to identify chemical contrast.
Main Results:
- Phase images predominantly reflect morphological changes, with phase peaks correlating to morphological valleys and vice versa.
- Inherent surface roughness often masks chemical-dependent phase contrast.
- Chemical contrast was detectable in very rough samples using hard tapping mode (amplitude set point ratio: -0.4 to -0.8).
- Chemical contrast was detectable in medium-roughness samples using light tapping mode (amplitude set point: -0.1 to -0.4).
Conclusions:
- Phase imaging AFM primarily visualizes surface topography rather than chemical composition.
- Surface roughness significantly influences the detectability of chemical information.
- Optimized tapping modes and amplitude set points are essential for resolving chemical variations in biomaterials and other surfaces.

