Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Is hoping the same as expecting? Discrimination between hopes and response expectancies for nonvolitional outcomes
Guy H Montgomery1, Daniel David, Terry Dilorenzo
1Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6576, USA.
Abstract:
Despite the large literature on response expectancy effects, it is not clear to what degree individuals' hopes are associated with their response expectancies for nonvolitional outcomes. Indeed, it is not clear whether these two constructs are separate. The present study sought to: (1) determine if participants can distinguish between expectancies and hopes; and (2) examine the relations between expectancies and hopes in regard to non-volitional outcomes. Seventy-three volunteers completed items regarding 10 non-volitional outcomes, as well as measures of dispositional traits (i.e. optimism, pessimism, suppression). The results revealed significant differences between expectancies and hopes (P<0.001), and that these constructs were also correlated. Dispositional traits and prior experience were also found to contribute to hopes and expectancies.
More Related Videos
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Purposive Learning
Blind Procedures
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Stereotype Content Model