Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Heart failure with normal ejection fraction: the complementary roles of echocardiography and CMR imaging
Darryl P Leong1, Carmine G De Pasquale, Joseph B Selvanayagam
1Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Insights
Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) is increasingly common. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging have complementary roles in diagnosing HFNEF, aiding patient care and clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF), previously diastolic heart failure, now constitutes up to 50% of heart failure cases.
- The prognosis for HFNEF may be comparable to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
- Diagnosis requires preserved left ventricular systolic function and evidence of diastolic dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the strengths and weaknesses of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in diagnosing HFNEF.
- To highlight complementary roles of these imaging modalities in HFNEF diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Review of echocardiography's limitations in assessing systolic function and its methods for evaluating diastolic function.
- Review of CMR's strengths in quantifying systolic function and its emerging techniques for diastolic assessment.
- Discussion of novel echocardiographic techniques (tissue velocity, strain analysis) and ancillary CMR findings (tissue characterization).
Main Results:
- Echocardiography excels in diastolic function assessment but has limitations in precise systolic function measurement.
- CMR is the gold standard for volumetric quantification of systolic function but has limitations in diastolic function characterization.
- Both modalities offer unique insights, suggesting a complementary diagnostic approach.
Conclusions:
- Echocardiography and CMR imaging possess distinct strengths and weaknesses for HFNEF diagnosis.
- A combined imaging strategy utilizing both echocardiography and CMR may offer a comprehensive approach to diagnosing HFNEF.
- Accurate imaging is crucial for individual patient management and the development of therapies for HFNEF.
Abstract:
Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF), previously referred to as diastolic heart failure, has increased in prevalence as a cause of heart failure, now accounting for up to 50% of all cases. Contrary to initial evidence, the prognostic outlook in HFNEF may be similar to that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. According to current consensus statements, the diagnosis of HFNEF requires the demonstration of relatively preserved systolic left ventricular function and evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Noninvasive imaging techniques now permit evaluation of these parameters without need for cardiac catheterization in the large majority of patients. Echocardiography is the modality of choice in the evaluation of diastolic function but suffers from limitations in its assessment of systolic function. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard in the volumetric quantification of systolic function; however, it has limitations in its ability to characterize diastolic function. This report aims to review the strengths and weaknesses of both imaging modalities in the diagnosis of HFNEF. With regards to echocardiography, it will specifically describe limitations in measuring left ventricular ejection fraction, describe novel techniques to assess systolic function such as tissue velocity and strain analysis, and will review the measurements used in the evaluation of diastolic function. With respect to CMR, this review will highlight its value in the assessment of systolic left ventricular function, will review ancillary CMR findings that may support the diagnosis of HFNEF such as tissue characterization, and will provide a brief overview of CMR techniques to assess diastolic function. We propose that these 2 modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of HFNEF. The importance of imaging in the diagnosis of HFNEF extends to both the individual patient and to clinical trials of therapies for this condition.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies