Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
The Hearing Scale Test for hearing screening of school-age children
Wen-Huei Liao1, Chiang-Feng Lien, Shuenn-Tsong Young
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Insights
A new Hearing Scale Test (HST) offers stratified hearing values for children, unlike standard pure-tone screening (PTS). This allows for more detailed hearing status assessment and follow-up tracking.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Pediatric Health
- Screening Technologies
Background:
- Conventional pure-tone screening (PTS) provides only a binary pass/fail outcome for hearing assessments in children.
- This binary result lacks the granularity needed for detailed hearing status evaluation and effective follow-up.
- There is a need for improved hearing screening methods that offer more comprehensive data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a novel modified hearing screening method, the Hearing Scale Test (HST).
- To demonstrate HST's capability for rapid hearing screening in children.
- To show HST's ability to provide stratified test values for each ear, enabling better hearing assessment.
Main Methods:
- The study involved 384 school-age children, comparing the proposed Hearing Scale Test (HST) with traditional pure-tone screening (PTS).
- PTS used four tones at specific frequencies and decibel levels, classifying results as pass or fail.
- HST utilized ten stratified hearing scales (S(1)-S(10)) with varying decibel levels, offering finer gradations of hearing ability.
Main Results:
- Both HST and PTS yielded comparable overall pass/fail results.
- HST provided detailed stratification of results, categorizing normal hearing (S(1)-S(5)), possible impairment (S(6)-S(7)), and confirmed impairment (S(8)-S(10) and NR).
- The distribution of results across HST scales indicated a wide range of hearing statuses within the screened population.
Conclusions:
- The Hearing Scale Test (HST) offers significant advantages over conventional PTS by providing stratified hearing values.
- HST enables a more accurate assessment of current hearing status and facilitates the recording of specific test values for follow-up.
- This enhanced data from HST supports better management of pediatric hearing health.
Objectives:
This study aimed to demonstrate a new modified hearing screening method that can rapidly screen hearing and provide stratified test values for each screened ear of children.
Methods:
The proposed Hearing Scale Test (HST) and pure-tone screening (PTS) were applied to 384 school-age children. PTS involved applying four test tones to each tested ear: 500 Hz at 25 dB, and 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz at 20 dB; and classifying the results as "pass" (normal hearing in the ear) or "fail" (possible hearing impairment). The HST employs ten stratified hearing scales from S(1) to S(10), with each hearing scale containing four test tones and where adjacent scales differ from each other by 5 B, ranging from 0 dB (S(1)) to 45 dB (S(10)). The four test tones of hearing scale S(5) are the same hearing criteria and the median reference standard of the stimulus level in the HST. Scales S(1)-S(5) on the HST are equivalent to a PTS "pass" result, while S(6)-S(10) and no response (NR) are equivalent to a PTS "fail" result.
Results:
The two screening methods produced comparable "pass" and "fail" results. In the HST, the "pass" results were further stratified as S(1) in 4 ears, S(2) in 52 ears, S(3) in 226 ears, S(4) in 272 ears, and S(5) in 169 ears, while the "fail" results were stratified as S(6) in 23 ears, S(7) in 12 ears, S(8) in 1 ear, S(9) in 2 ears, S(10) in 5 ears, and no response (NR) in 2 ears. The hearing screening results of the HST are interpreted as follows: scales S(1)-S(5) indicate normal hearing, scales S(6) and S(7) indicate possible hearing impairment, and scales S(8)-S(10) and NR indicate confirmed hearing impairment.
Conclusions:
Conventional PTS only gives a pass/fail result for each screened ear, lacks hearing status assessment, and lacks stratified test values to be recorded for follow-up. In contrast, the HST has stratified hearing scales for each screened ear, which reflects the current hearing status and provides test values that can be recorded for follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...
Perception of Sound Waves
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
Auditory Perception

