Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

05:21
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
A computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments produced responsive measures of function
Dennis L Hart1, Ying-Chih Wang, Karon F Cook
1Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc, PO Box 11444, Knoxville, TN 37939, USA. hart@fotoinc.com
Physical Therapy
|April 17, 2010
Summary
The shoulder computerized adaptive test (CAT) is efficient for collecting functional status data. This study found the shoulder CAT precise, sensitive, and responsive for patients with shoulder impairments.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) offer efficient data collection with minimal loss of measurement precision.
- The administrative efficiency, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness of shoulder CAT-based functional status (CAT-FS) measures have not been previously evaluated.
- This study addresses these gaps by assessing the shoulder CAT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency and responsiveness of the shoulder CAT.
- To assess the precision, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness of CAT-FS measures in patients with shoulder impairments.
Main Methods:
- A secondary analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from 30,987 patients with shoulder impairments undergoing outpatient rehabilitation.
- Patients completed the shoulder CAT at intake, with 13,805 (45% completion rate) also completing it at discharge.
- Efficiency of CAT administration and responsiveness of CAT-FS measures were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Patients answered an average of 6 CAT items in approximately 1.5 minutes, yielding precise CAT-FS estimates.
- The CAT-FS measures demonstrated negligible floor and minimal ceiling effects, with 94% of scores between 20 and 80.
- Seventy-nine percent of patients showed changes greater than minimal detectable change, and 76% exceeded minimal clinically important improvement.
Conclusions:
- The shoulder CAT demonstrated efficiency in data collection.
- CAT-FS measures proved to be precise, sensitive to change, and responsive.
- Future research should aim for more complete data to mitigate potential patient selection bias from secondary analysis.

