Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Intentionality attributions about perfect and imperfect duty violations
Jamie S Hughes1, David Trafimow
1New Mexico State University, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3452, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA. jshughes@nmsu.edu
Abstract:
Intentionality attributions were explored by drawing on the distinction between perfect and imperfect moral duties. Previous research has shown that perfect duty violations carry greater attributional weight than imperfect duty violations (Trafimow & Trafimow, 1999; Trafimow, Bromgard, Finlay, & Ketelaar, 2005). In Studies 1 and 2, the distinction between perfect and imperfect duties was replicated with intentionality judgments, and perfect duty violations received higher intentionality attributions than imperfect duty violations. In Study 3 this effect was reversed by manipulating information about an agent's mental intentions or plans to perform a behavior. That is, participants attributed less intentionality to perfect duty violations compared to imperfect duty violations when a mental intention to perform the behavior was absent.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attribution Theory
Attribution
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Correspondence Bias

