Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying Work

Quantifying Work

As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.

Measures of Central Tendency

Measures of Central Tendency

The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians, "average" is commonly accepted for "arithmetic mean."

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Targeting hypoxic tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer.

Journal of hematology & oncology·2021

Same author

Acupuncture for persistent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2021

Same author

The Prognostic Significance of miR-21 Expression among Surgically Resected Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis and Retrospective Cohort Study.

BioMed research international·2021

Same author

Preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: challenges and opportunities in the era of precision medicine.

Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR·2021

Same author

Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial).

BMJ open·2020

Same author

Increased fibrillarin expression is associated with tumor progression and an unfavorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Oncology letters·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Quantitative biomechanical workplace exposure measures: distribution centers.

William S Marras¹, Steven A Lavender, Sue A Ferguson

¹Biodynamics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. marras.1@osu.edu

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology : Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology

|April 20, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative assessment of physical work exposures reveals distribution workers face higher risks for low back pain due to extreme loads and rapid movements compared to manufacturing roles. This highlights the need for precise biomechanical measures in risk analysis.

More Related Videos

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice

Published on: May 24, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice

Published on: May 24, 2024

Area of Science:

Occupational Health
Biomechanics
Epidemiology

Background:

Previous studies on physical work exposures and low back pain (LBP) used broad categories, yielding moderate risk associations.
Characterizing work demands quantitatively is crucial for precise biomechanical risk analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantitatively assess physical work exposures during lifting in distribution centers.
To compare these exposures with manufacturing environments and inform LBP risk assessments.

Main Methods:

Sophisticated instrumentation continuously documented 390 physical exposures during lifting tasks in four distribution center types.
Exposures were analyzed based on distribution center type and compared to existing manufacturing data.

Main Results:

Static load measures significantly underestimated dynamic load exposures.
Distribution workers experienced lift durations of 11-12% of cycle time.
Distribution workers were exposed to greater extreme loads and moved faster than manufacturing employees.

Conclusions:

Quantitative biomechanical analysis provides more accurate insights into occupational LBP risk.
Distribution work environments present higher physical demands than manufacturing.
This data is essential for developing targeted LBP prevention strategies.