Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

In memoriam: D. Alan Stubbs, 1940-2014.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2015

Same author

Interactions of numerical and temporal stimulus characteristics on the control of response location by brief flashes of light.

Learning & behavior·2011

Same author

Categorical counting.

Behavioural processes·2010

Same author

Watching the clock.

Behavioural processes·2009

Same author

Duration ratio discrimination in pigeons: a criterion-setting analysis.

Behavioural processes·2005

Same author

The development of emergent differential sample behavior in pigeons.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2003

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Prospective and retrospective timing by pigeons.

J Gregor Fetterman¹, P Richard Killeen

¹Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. gfetter@iupui.edu

Learning & Behavior

|April 20, 2010

Summary

Pigeons learned to distinguish between short and long durations. Their timing accuracy depended on whether the signal or choice keys provided duration information, with signal keys being more influential.

Area of Science:

Animal Cognition
Behavioral Neuroscience
Comparative Psychology

Background:

Pigeons (Columba livia) are adept at temporal discrimination tasks.
Understanding how animals process temporal information is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how pigeons utilize different sources of temporal information (signal vs. choice keys) in a duration discrimination task.
To examine the influence of retrospective and prospective timing cues on choice behavior.

Main Methods:

Pigeons were trained to discriminate between short (2.5, 5 sec) and long (5, 10 sec) durations.
Key colors signaled duration ranges, with manipulations to test signal-key ambiguity and choice-key informativeness.
Conditions included retrospective, prospective, inconsistent, and conflict trials.

More Related Videos

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)

Published on: September 7, 2018

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

Main Results:

Choice accuracy decreased when the signal key was ambiguous (retrospective condition).
Accuracy improved in the prospective condition where the signal key was informative.
In conflict trials, pigeon choice behavior was primarily driven by the signal-key color.

Conclusions:

Pigeons prioritize signal-key information over choice-key information when resolving temporal ambiguities.
Findings contribute to understanding temporal processing strategies in animals and inform theories of timing.