Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and
Benjamin H Freed1, Lissa Sugeng, Kathleen Furlong
1Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
Many patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) miss life-saving aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to underrecognized symptoms and overestimated risks. Guidelines recommend AVR, but many eligible patients do not receive this crucial intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Valvular Heart Disease
- Aortic Stenosis
Background:
- Official guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) for symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) with a Class I indication.
- However, a significant number of patients with symptomatic, severe AS do not undergo AVR.
- This study investigates the reasons for this discrepancy in a university hospital setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the proportion and characteristics of patients with severe AS who do not undergo AVR.
- To identify the reasons for the lack of AVR referrals despite guideline indications.
- To analyze outcomes for patients with severe AS who do not receive AVR.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of consecutive patients with severe AS diagnosed by echocardiography at an academic hospital.
- Review of patient records for clinical presentation, comorbidities, surgical intervention, and outcomes.
- Analysis of reasons for not undergoing AVR, including symptom attribution and use of exercise stress testing.
Main Results:
- Of 106 patients with severe AS, 33 (31%) underwent AVR, while 73 (69%) did not.
- Among those without AVR, 31 (42%) were symptomatic, with symptoms often attributed to causes other than AS.
- Only 4% of the 42 patients (58%) deemed asymptomatic had undergone exercise stress testing. 15 (14%) of the 73 patients without AVR died during follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Physicians frequently underrecognize symptoms and overestimate operative risks in patients with severe AS.
- Exercise stress testing is underutilized in identifying symptomatic patients who could benefit from AVR.
- Many patients with a Class I indication for AVR are not receiving this life-saving treatment, highlighting a gap in care.
Abstract:
The official guidelines for the treatment of patients with valvular heart disease have given a class I indication for aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, many patients with symptomatic, severe AS do not undergo AVR. We sought to determine the proportion and characteristics of patients with severe AS who do not undergo AVR in a university hospital and to identify the reasons for the lack of surgical referrals, despite the class I guideline indications. We retrospectively studied consecutive patients from an academic hospital with severe AS, as determined by echocardiographic criteria. The records were reviewed for clinical presentation, co-morbidities, surgical intervention, and outcomes. Of the 106 patients with severe AS, 33 (31%) had undergone AVR and 73 (69%) had not. Of those patients without AVR, 31 (42%) were symptomatic. The most common reason the patients with symptomatic, severe AS did not undergo AVR was their symptoms were thought to be unrelated to AS. Of the 42 patients (58%) who were deemed asymptomatic, only 4% had undergone exercise stress testing. With an average follow-up of 15 months, 15 (14%) of the 73 patients who did not undergo AVR died. In patients with severe AS, physicians commonly underrecognize symptoms and overestimate the operative risk. The exercise stress tests were underused in determining which patients with severe AS were symptomatic. As a result, many patients with a class I indication for AVR, who would benefit from this life-saving intervention, do not receive it.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
