Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Cardiac Loading using Passive Left Atrial Pressurization and Passive Afterload for Graft Assessment
Published on: August 2, 2024
Usefulness of cardiac index and peak exercise oxygen consumption for determining priority for cardiac transplantation
Amanda Methvin1, Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos
1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Insights
Patients with heart failure and discordant peak oxygen consumption (Vo2) and cardiac index (CI) require careful evaluation. Those with low Vo2 but preserved CI show survival similar to post-transplant patients, suggesting medical management may suffice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Cardiac transplantation listing decisions are challenging for heart failure patients with discordant peak exercise oxygen consumption (Vo2) and cardiac index (CI) values.
- Understanding the prognostic implications of these discordant values is crucial for optimizing patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the event-free survival and overall survival in heart failure patients categorized by discordant peak Vo2 and CI values.
- To determine if specific discordant patterns predict outcomes and guide transplantation listing decisions.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 105 heart failure patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing and cardiac catheterization for transplantation evaluation were studied.
- Patients were stratified into four groups based on peak Vo2 (> or = 12 ml/min/kg) and CI (> or = 1.8 L/min/m2) thresholds.
- Event-free survival (death or ventricular assist device implantation) and median survival were compared across the four groups over a median follow-up of 3.7 years.
Main Results:
- Nearly half of the patients exhibited discordant peak Vo2 and CI measurements.
- Patients with lower peak Vo2 but preserved CI (Group 3) demonstrated event-free survival comparable to patients with both values preserved (Group 1).
- Patients with low CI but preserved peak Vo2 (Group 2) had a lower survival rate compared to Group 1, and Group 4 (low Vo2 and low CI) had the lowest survival rates.
Conclusions:
- Discordant peak Vo2 and CI values in heart failure patients have significant prognostic implications.
- Heart failure patients with low peak Vo2 but preserved CI may be safely managed medically, potentially avoiding early transplantation listing.
- Conversely, patients with low CI and preserved peak Vo2 may benefit from earlier consideration for cardiac transplantation listing due to poorer survival outcomes.
Abstract:
Decisions regarding cardiac transplantation listing are difficult in patients with heart failure who have relatively discordant peak exercise oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) and cardiac index (CI) values. One hundred five patients with heart failure who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and right-sided cardiac catheterization for transplantation evaluation were studied. Patients were divided into 4 groups on the basis of peak Vo(2) and CI: group 1, Vo(2) > or = 12 ml/min/kg, CI > or = 1.8 L/min/m(2) (n = 30); group 2, Vo(2) > or = 12 ml/min/kg, CI <1.8, L/min/m(2) (n = 27); group 3, Vo(2) <12 ml/min/kg, CI > or = 1.8 L/min/m(2) (n = 25); and group 4, Vo(2) <12 ml/min/kg, CI <1.8 L/min/m(2) (n = 23). Groups were compared for event-free (death or ventricular assist device) survival. The overall CI was 1.9 + or - 0.4 L/min/m(2) and peak Vo(2) was 12.4 + or - 2.8 ml/min/kg; values in the 4 groups were as follows: group 1, peak Vo(2) 14.7 + or - 2.1 ml/min/kg, CI 2.2 + or - 0.3 L/min/m(2); group 2, peak VO(2) 14.2 + or - 1.3 ml/min/kg, CI 1.5 + or - 0.2 L/min/m(2); group 3, peak Vo(2) 10.2 + or - 1.3 ml/min/kg, CI 2.1 + or - 0.3 L/min/m(2); and group 4, peak Vo(2) 9.7 + or - 2.0 ml/min/kg, CI 1.6 + or - 0.2 L/min/m(2). After a median follow-up period of 3.7 years, 28 patients (26.0%) had events. Event-free survival was 96%, 95%, 96%, and 79% for 6 months (p = 0.04); 88%, 81%, 90%, and 73% for 12 months (p = 0.09); 88%, 73%, 85%, and 65% for 18 months (p = 0.11); and 83%, 73%, 79%, and 53% for 24 months (p = 0.06) for groups 1 to 4, respectively. Median survival was 5.1, 3.0, 3.9, and 2.6 years, respectively, in groups 1 to 4 (p = 0.052). In conclusion, almost half the patients had relatively discordant peak Vo(2) and CI measurements. Patients with lower peak Vo(2) values but relatively preserved CI values had survival comparable to post-transplantation survival, whereas those with low CI but preserved Vo(2) had a lower survival rate. These results suggest that the former group may be safely monitored on medical therapy, whereas the latter may benefit from early listing.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be met...
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac output averages...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

