Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Data-Driven Guideline Adherence in Data Representation and Compliance Measurement: Scoping Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Same author

Evaluating the Utility of a Clinical Sepsis AI Tool in Emergency Waiting Rooms: A Preliminary Silent Trial.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025

Same author

Pathologists' integration of prior biopsies of women with germline PTEN mutations may expedite the identification of this rare cancer predisposition syndrome.

Pathology·2024

Same author

Clinical, histological and receptor profiles of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in females with germline pathogenic variants in PTEN and implications for germline testing.

Pathology·2024

Same author

Equitable Machine Learning for Hypoglycaemia Risk Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2024

Same author

How digital health translational research is prioritised: a qualitative stakeholder-driven approach to decision support evaluation.

BMJ open·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical decision support foundations.

Malcolm Pradhan¹, Siaw Teng Liaw

¹Alcidion Corporation, University of South Australia. mp@alcidion.com.au

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

|April 22, 2010

Summary

This educational overview explains clinical decision-making elements, including probability, evidence, and utility. It details a framework for clinical decision support systems and the role of knowledge management.

Area of Science:

Clinical Decision Making
Health Informatics
Knowledge Management

Background:

Understanding the components of clinical decisions is crucial for effective healthcare.
Current decision-making processes can be complex and require structured support.
The integration of knowledge management is vital for robust clinical decision support systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide an educational overview of clinical decision-making elements.
To outline a framework for clinical decision support, emphasizing validity, utility, importance, and certainty.
To discuss the role of knowledge management in developing and maintaining clinical decision support systems.

Main Methods:

Conceptual overview of decision-making components: prior probability, evidence, posterior probability, actions, and utility.

Related Experiment Videos

Presentation of a decision-making framework for clinical support.

Discussion on the essential elements of a clinical decision support system.

Exploration of knowledge management's contribution to clinical decision support.

Main Results:

Identified key elements of clinical decisions and the decision-making process.
Proposed a framework for clinical decision support encompassing validity, utility, importance, and certainty.
Defined the necessary components for a clinical decision support system.
Highlighted the significance of knowledge management in system construction and maintenance.

Conclusions:

A structured approach to clinical decision-making enhances healthcare outcomes.
Effective clinical decision support systems require clearly defined elements and a robust framework.
Knowledge management is integral to the successful implementation and ongoing utility of clinical decision support systems.