Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction01:24

Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction

Affect plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal evaluations and perceptions. Emotions influence how individuals judge and respond to others, often determining whether interactions are viewed positively or negatively. This effect can manifest directly through interactions with the person in question or indirectly via associations with unrelated emotional experiences.Direct Effects of Affect on AttractionAffect directly influences interpersonal attraction when a person’s behavior elicits...
The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
Attitudes01:54

Attitudes

Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be interpreted as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Victims of Conspiracies? An Examination of the Relationship Between Conspiracy Beliefs and Dispositional Individual Victimhood.

European journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

The Role of the Information Source in Debunking Health Myths Using the Truth Sandwich Format.

Health communication·2026
Same author

No evidence for causal effects of trust in science on intentions for health-related behavior.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

The misuse of "natural" claims on food products and how they can influence perceptions of naturalness and healthiness.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Teaching evidence-based medicine in medical education: data on barriers and requirements in non-university and university hospitals.

BMC medical education·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: implications for risk perception.

Simone Dohle1, Carmen Keller, Michael Siegrist

  • 1Institute for Environmental Decisions, Consumer Behavior, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. sdohle@ethz.ch

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 23, 2010
PubMed
Summary

People use emotional responses, or affect, to quickly assess risks. This study used implicit association tests to show that negative affect is linked to high-dread risks like nuclear power, while positive affect is linked to low-dread risks.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Risk Perception
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Affective responses significantly influence risk perception.
  • The affect heuristic suggests reliance on spontaneous emotions over detailed analysis for risk assessment.
  • Understanding implicit affect is crucial for a comprehensive view of risk perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) as a measure of affect in risk perception.
  • To investigate the relationship between the 'dread' dimension of hazards and the affect they evoke.
  • To explore the utility of implicit measures in understanding risk attitudes.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) to measure implicit associations with various hazards.
  • Correlated SC-IAT results with explicit measures of affect, trust, and subjective knowledge.
  • Compared affect evoked by high-dread (nuclear power), medium-dread (hydroelectric power), and non-dread (home appliances) hazards.

Main Results:

  • The SC-IAT demonstrated construct validity, correlating with explicit affect and trust measures, but not subjective knowledge.
  • High-dread hazards (nuclear power) elicited significantly more negative associations than medium-dread hazards (hydroelectric power).
  • Non-dread hazards (home appliances) evoked positive associations, contrasting with high-dread risks.

Conclusions:

  • Affect plays a critical role in shaping public attitudes and opinions toward different types of risks.
  • Implicit measures, such as the SC-IAT, offer valuable insights into risk perception beyond traditional explicit measures.
  • The 'dread' factor in risk perception is strongly associated with underlying negative affective responses.