Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Ophthalmic pathology grossing: The globe].

Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Magnetic resonance imaging-based detection of retinal hemorrhages in a multicenter cohort of abusive head trauma.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same author

miRNA profiling in pediatric and young adult Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology·2026
Same author

Drug-Induced Liver Failure Following Topical Minoxidil: A Case Report.

Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine·2025
Same author

Pathologist-like explainable AI for interpretable Gleason grading in prostate cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Brain lesions in pediatric abusive head trauma: prevalence, pathophysiology, patterns, and a classification system.

European radiology·2025
Same journal

B vitamins intake and cancer risk: a structured narrative review of evidence on riboflavin, pyridoxine, cobalamin and folate.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
Same journal

Multiple subcutaneous nodules as the primary presentation of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a case report and literature review.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
Same journal

<i>Connexin 43</i> enhances liver metastatic ability of GIST cells <i>in vivo</i>.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
Same journal

Proof-of-principle 4-marker spatial profiling reveals distinct, location-independent immune clusters in biliary tract cancers.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
Same journal

Genotyping of suspected partial hydatidiform moles - our experiences and future directions.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
Same journal

Prognostic impact of p53 and HER2 immunohistochemistry profiles in colorectal carcinoma.

Pathology oncology research : POR·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study.

Daniel Wittschieber1, Jens Köllermann, Thorsten Schlomm

  • 1Institute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. daniel.wittschieber@charite.de

Pathology Oncology Research : POR
|April 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gleason grading of prostate cancer provides prognostic information even in small tissue samples, unlike nuclear grading. Gleason grading remains the preferred method for assessing prostate cancer prognosis.

More Related Videos

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Urology

Background:

  • Accurate prognostic grading of prostate cancer is crucial for treatment decisions.
  • Assessing prognostic value in small tissue samples is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the prognostic utility of nuclear grading (modified Fuhrman) versus Gleason grading in small prostate cancer tissue samples.
  • To determine if nuclear grading offers additional prognostic information beyond Gleason grading.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of a tissue microarray (TMA) with 3,261 prostate cancer samples.
  • Grading of TMA spots (0.6 mm) using modified Fuhrman and simplified Gleason systems, blinded to clinical data.
  • Comparison of grading results with tumor stage, grade, and post-prostatectomy PSA recurrence data.

Main Results:

  • Nuclear grading on TMA spots showed no correlation with tumor stage, grade, or PSA recurrence.
  • Gleason grading on TMA spots provided significant prognostic information.
  • Agreement between TMA Gleason scores and prostatectomy specimen Gleason scores was moderate for low/intermediate grades and poor for high grades.

Conclusions:

  • Modified Fuhrman nuclear grading lacks prognostic importance in prostate cancer.
  • Gleason grading is the system of choice for prognostic assessment, even with small tumor specimens (<1 mm).
  • Gleason grading in small samples offers valuable prognostic data, though agreement with full specimen grading varies by grade.