Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same author

Regulatory factor X 7 limits Myc activity during B cell activation and suppresses Myc-dependent lymphomagenesis.

Nature immunology·2026
Same author

What is the general Welfare: Welfare economic perspectives on equity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

A Real-World Experience on the Efficacy of First-Line Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with PD-L1 Expression ≥50%: The Role of <i>KRAS</i> Mutations.

Cancers·2025
Same author

CONTRAST prioritisation tool: filtering and ranking contaminants of emerging concern in the marine environment using hazard-based approaches.

Environmental sciences Europe·2025
Same author

Prognostic and Biological Roles of Parkinson's Disease-Associated Genes in Cancer.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

SKIP SEQUENCING: A DECISION PROBLEM IN QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN.

Charles F Manski1, Francesca Molinari

  • 1Department of Economics and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2600, USA, cfmanski@northwestern.edu.

The Annals of Applied Statistics
|April 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a formal decision framework for questionnaire design, optimizing skip sequencing to balance survey cost and data informativeness. It helps planners minimize loss when deciding whether to ask all, skip, or omit survey questions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Survey Methodology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Questionnaire design involves complex trade-offs between data quality, cost, and respondent burden.
  • Skip sequencing is a common technique to reduce survey length and cost, but its impact on data quality is not fully understood.
  • Traditional approaches may not adequately address the inferential challenges posed by item nonresponse and response error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formalize questionnaire design as a decision problem, specifically focusing on skip sequencing strategies.
  • To propose the use of an explicit loss function for quantifying the cost-informativeness trade-off in survey planning.
  • To provide a framework for choosing optimal survey design strategies under conditions of item nonresponse and response error.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating the choice between three survey design options: full inquiry, skip sequencing, and omission.
  • Developing a decision-theoretic approach using a loss function to guide design choices.
  • Analyzing the impact of item nonresponse and response error on the informativeness and cost of different design options.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrates how a survey planner can systematically choose between asking all, using skip sequencing, or omitting a question based on a defined loss function.
  • Quantifies the trade-offs between the cost and informativeness of each design option.
  • Highlights how inferential problems like nonresponse and response error influence the optimal design choice.

Conclusions:

  • An explicit loss function provides a robust method for optimizing skip sequencing in questionnaire design.
  • The proposed framework enables informed decisions that balance survey costs with desired data informativeness, even with data quality challenges.
  • This approach enhances survey planning by formally integrating cost-benefit analyses with statistical considerations.