Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea.

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association·2026

Same author

An Observational Cohort Study on Non-Recurrence Procedural Intervention and Reoperation for Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair.

Annals of surgery·2026

Same author

Association of Sex With the Use and Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization: A Cohort Study.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026

Same author

Postmarket Surveillance of Neuroendovascular Devices.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026

Same author

From use cases to infrastructure: a cross-institutional survey of priorities in data-driven biomedical research.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026

Same author

Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement and Risk of Infection After Knee Arthroplasty in High-Risk Patients: A Register Based Meta-Analysis.

JB & JS open access·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

Published on: March 3, 2014

A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies.

Art Sedrakyan¹, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Sharon-Lise T Normand

¹Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA. art.sedrakyan@fda.hhs.gov

|April 28, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Conducting comparative studies for implantable medical devices (IMDs) presents unique challenges. This article proposes a framework to address methodological issues in IMD evidence evaluation for improved safety and effectiveness research.

More Related Videos

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

Published on: February 28, 2012

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Published on: June 27, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

Published on: March 3, 2014

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

Published on: February 28, 2012

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Published on: June 27, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical device research
Clinical trial methodology
Interventional medicine

Background:

Implantable medical devices (IMDs) are integral to modern interventional medicine.
Evaluating IMDs requires distinct methodological approaches compared to pharmaceuticals.
Existing frameworks often fall short in addressing unique device-related complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a general conceptual framework for evidence evaluation of IMDs.
To highlight critical methodological issues in designing comparative device studies.
To guide future research on IMD safety and effectiveness.

Main Methods:

Conceptual framework development for IMD evaluation.
Discussion of unique challenges in randomization, masking, and allocation concealment for devices.
Identification of variability sources specific to device studies (e.g., learning curves, technical aspects).

Main Results:

Comparative studies of IMDs necessitate tailored approaches to design and execution.
Sources of variability like operator learning curves and device characteristics complicate study analysis.
Observational studies of IMDs face significant challenges in group selection and confounding adjustment.

Conclusions:

A standardized framework is crucial for robust comparative evaluation of IMDs.
Addressing device-specific methodological issues is essential for advancing IMD research.
Further methodological work is needed to enhance the comparative assessment of IMDs.