Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Medium of exchange matters: what's fair for goods is unfair for money
Sanford E DeVoe1, Sheena S Iyengar
1University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management, 105 St George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sanford.devoe@rotman.utoronto.ca
Abstract:
Organized groups face a fundamental problem of how to distribute resources fairly. We found people view it as less fair to distribute resources equally when the allocated resource invokes the market by being a medium of exchange than when the allocated resource is a good that holds value in use. These differences in fairness can be attributed to being a medium of exchange, and not to other essential properties of money (i.e., being a unit of account or a store of value). These findings suggest that egalitarian outcomes have a greater likelihood of being accepted as fair when the resources being distributed take the form of in-kind goods rather than of cash transfers.
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Skewness
The longer the tail of the plot on one side, the more skewed it is. The skewness of a data set’s values suggests that the measures of central tendency are...
Framing Effects
