Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Difficulties in interpreting HbA(1c) results
Katarzyna Homa1, Liliana Majkowska
1Department of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland. kasho@interia.pl
Insights
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) tests are crucial for diabetes management and diagnosis. However, results may require cautious interpretation and alternative markers like fructosamine when they don't align with patient glycemia and symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Endocrinology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a key biomarker for assessing glycemic control in diabetes.
- The American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines recommend frequent HbA1c testing for diabetes management and diagnosis.
- High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) is recognized as the reference method for HbA1c measurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role and limitations of HbA1c testing in diabetes care.
- To highlight circumstances where HbA1c results may lack clinical reliability.
- To suggest alternative glycemic control markers when HbA1c is inconclusive.
Main Methods:
- Review of American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards for HbA1c testing.
- Discussion of high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) as a reference method.
- Identification of clinical scenarios and conditions affecting HbA1c test accuracy.
Main Results:
- HbA1c testing frequency recommendations vary based on clinical stability and treatment goals.
- HPLC is the established reference method for HbA1c quantification.
- Certain conditions can compromise the clinical reliability of HbA1c results.
Conclusions:
- HbA1c is vital for diabetes assessment, but results must be interpreted cautiously.
- When HbA1c levels conflict with clinical data, alternative diagnostic methods are advised.
- Fructosamine and 1,5-anhydroglucitol are potential alternative markers for glycemic control assessment.
Abstract:
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is a parameter broadly employed in the assessment of glycemic control in diabetes. The 2010 "Standards of medical care in diabetes", published by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), recommended performing the HbA(1c) test at least every 6 months in patients in whom disease is clinically stable, while subjects after modifications of therapy or in whom glycemic goals have not been met should be tested every 3 months. Moreover, the ADA suggested the HbA(1c) assay be implemented in the diagnosis of diabetes and in the detection of an increased risk of developing this disease. Among various approaches employed to measure the concentration of HbA(1c), high-pressure liquid chromatography is considered to be a reference method. HbA(1c) tests might not be clinically reliable in some circumstances. In cases when HbA(1c) levels do not correlate with glycemia and clinical symptoms, the results should be interpreted with caution, several conditions known to influence the measurement should be taken into account, and use of another diagnostic method, or even testing another marker of glycemic control, e.g., fructosamine or 1,5-anhydroglucitol, should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Hyperglycemia
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Hypoglycemia
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...