Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Does choice of antidiabetes therapy influence macrovascular outcomes?
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Bridgeport Hospital, 267 Grant Street, Bridgeport, CT 06610, USA. pszari@bpthosp.org
Insights
Controlling hemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is linked to cardiovascular disease risk. This review examines antidiabetic therapies to reduce cardiovascular events in T2DM patients.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease.
- The relationship between hemoglobin A1c levels and CV risk in T2DM is well-established epidemiologically.
- Despite this, prospective studies on intensive glucose-lowering benefits for CV events show conflicting results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an evidence-based review of antidiabetic therapies for reducing CV events in T2DM.
- To address the long-standing controversy regarding the choice of antidiabetic medications and their impact on macrovascular outcomes.
- To inform clinical decisions for long-term CV event prevention in T2DM patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing prospective studies and epidemiological data.
- Analysis of historical and recent controversies surrounding specific antidiabetic drug classes (sulfonylureas, rosiglitazone, metformin).
- Evidence-based assessment of therapeutic strategies for macrovascular risk reduction in T2DM.
Main Results:
- Conflicting results exist regarding the efficacy of intensive glucose lowering in reducing CV events in T2DM.
- Historical concerns about sulfonylureas and CV mortality have evolved, with current consensus suggesting safety.
- Controversies persist regarding rosiglitazone's CV safety, and metformin's macrovascular benefits require clearer substantiation.
Conclusions:
- Long-term prevention of CV events is crucial for T2DM patients, who may live decades with the disease.
- The choice of antidiabetic therapy requires careful consideration of CV risk and evidence.
- Further research and clear guidelines are needed to optimize antidiabetic treatment for cardiovascular risk reduction in T2DM.
Abstract:
Despite a clear epidemiologic relationship between hemoglobin A(1c) levels and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), prospective studies examining the benefit of intensive glucose lowering in reducing CV events have yielded conflicting results. Controversy over the choice of antidiabetic therapy for lowering macrovascular events has existed for nearly four decades, beginning with the potential risk of increased CV mortality with sulfonylurea use. Although sulfonylureas were subsequently felt to be safe, a more recent controversy was raised as to whether rosiglitazone use was associated with an increased risk of CV events. Additionally, early positive results for metformin in reducing macrovascular events have not been clearly substantiated. Because a typical patient with T2DM may live 20 to 40 years with the disease, long-term prevention of CV events is very important. An evidenced-based review of choice of antidiabetic therapy to reduce CV events in T2DM is discussed below.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetic Retinopathy