Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
The impact of changing ICD code on hypertension-related mortality in the southeastern United States from 1994-2005
JaNae Joyner-Grantham1, Debra R Simmons, Michael A Moore
1Consortium for Southeastern Hypertension Control (COSEHC) and Wake Forest University Hypertension and Vascular Research Center, Winston Salem, NC 27113-5097, USA. jjoyner@wfubmc.edu
Insights
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code revisions impact cardiovascular disease mortality trends. The ICD-10 change in 1999 affected heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes rates in the Southeast US.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) trend analysis is complicated by revisions in disease classification systems like the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).
- Accurate mortality data is crucial for understanding disease burden and informing public health strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the impact of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code revision on mortality trends for heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes in 16 Southeast states.
- To assess whether the ICD code change in 1999 influenced the observed mortality trends in the specified population.
Main Methods:
- Utilized mortality data from 1994-2005 Centers for Disease Control National Vital Statistics Reports for 16 Southeast states.
- Analyzed data separately for periods before (1994-1998) and after (1999-2005) the ICD code revision.
- Employed comparability ratios for pooled analysis (1994-2005) and confidence interval analysis to compare rates at the year of code change.
Main Results:
- Overall trends of decreasing heart disease and cerebrovascular disease mortality, and increasing diabetes mortality from 1994-2005 were not altered by the ICD code revision.
- However, the transition to ICD-10 in 1999 led to an underestimation of heart disease and cerebrovascular disease mortality and an overestimation of diabetes mortality rates in the Southeast US.
Conclusions:
- While overall long-term trends remained consistent, the ICD code revision introduced biases in specific disease mortality rates.
- Health and disease burden profiles relying on mortality data must account for the influence of ICD code revisions.
- Primary care providers should critically evaluate the comparability of mortality data across ICD code revisions before drawing conclusions.
Abstract:
Confusion surrounding cardiovascular disease trends arises when measurement and reporting of classification systems such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code are revised. The current study examined the impact of ICD code revision on mortality trends for heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes in 16 Southeast states using data published in the 1994-2005 Centers for Disease Control National Vital Statistics Reports. Data were averaged by year and analyzed separately before (1994-1998) and after (1999-2005) the ICD code change, pooled across codes using comparability ratios (1994-2005), and further compared at the year of ICD code change using standard error of 1998 data to determine whether corresponding 1999 rates fell within 95% confidence intervals. The change in classification did not alter Southeast US trends regarding a decrease in heart disease and cerebrovascular disease rates and an increase in diabetes mortality in years 1994-2005. On the other hand, the change in ICD code classification systems did impact mortality rates for heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes, suggesting that change in code to ICD-10 in 1999 underestimates heart disease and cerebrovascular disease and overestimates diabetes mortality rates in the Southeast United States. Health and disease burden profiles, which use mortality data to measure health status, need to carefully evaluate and report the influence of ICD code revisions as they draw conclusions. Primary care health providers should question the impact and comparability of ICD revision before accepting mortality trend conclusions.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies