Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of interest.

Censoring Survival Data

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Survival Curves

Survival Curves

Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phase II Study of Adavosertib in Patients With Tumors Containing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1I.

JCO precision oncology·2026

Same author

Larotrectinib in Patients With Tumors With <i>NTRK</i> Fusions: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-Z1E.

JCO precision oncology·2026

Same author

Crizotinib in Patients with Tumors with MET Amplification or Exon 14 Deletion: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols C1 and C2.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026

Same author

Phase II Study of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With Tumors With <i>BRAF</i><sup><i>V600E</i></sup> Mutations: Updated Results From NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol H.

JCO precision oncology·2026

Same author

Phase II Study of Vismodegib in Patients With <i>SMO-</i> or <i>PTCH1</i>-Mutated Tumors: Results From the National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol T.

JCO precision oncology·2025

Same author

PIK3CB Inhibitor GSK2636771 in Cancers With <i>PTEN</i> Mutation/Deletion or Loss of PTEN Protein Expression: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols N and P.

JCO precision oncology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Testing and interval estimation for two-sample survival comparisons with small sample sizes and unequal censoring.

Rui Wang¹, Stephen W Lagakos, Robert J Gray

¹Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. rwang@hsph.harvard.edu

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)

|May 5, 2010

Summary

New permutation methods improve survival analysis for small samples with unequal censoring. These techniques offer better interval estimates and reliable testing, outperforming standard approaches in simulations and real-world trials.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Survival Analysis

Background:

The log-rank test is standard for survival data but can be unreliable with small sample sizes.
Existing permutation tests may fail when censoring distributions differ between groups.
Interval estimates for treatment differences also face challenges in small samples.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop novel methods for survival data analysis in small samples.
To address limitations of existing tests when censoring is unequal.
To provide reliable interval estimation for treatment effects.

Main Methods:

Developed two new methods based on imputing survival and censoring times.
Applied permutation methods to the imputed data.
Provided heuristic justification for a related existing approach.

Main Results:

Proposed methods demonstrate good Type I error and statistical power in simulations.
Confidence intervals show improved coverage probabilities in small samples compared to asymptotic methods.
Methods maintain similar efficiency to asymptotic methods with larger sample sizes.

Conclusions:

The new permutation-based methods are effective for small-sample survival analysis with unequal censoring.
These methods offer superior performance for interval estimation in small samples.
The approach is validated by simulations and illustrated with clinical trial data.