Systematic quality control for management of ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in setting of local network
R Zanini1, F Buffoli, L Tomasi
1Division of Cardiology, "Carlo Poma" Hospital, Mantova, Italy. roberto.zanini@ospedalimantova.it
Insights
Quality indicators effectively measure and improve care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Optimizing pre-hospital diagnosis and emergency services reduces critical treatment times.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Evidence-based guidelines are crucial for assessing and enhancing healthcare quality.
- A dedicated network for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management was established in 2004.
- A clinical database was implemented to monitor care quality for STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure the quality of care provided to STEMI patients.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a STEMI management network.
- To identify areas for improvement in myocardial infarction care.
Main Methods:
- Development of a real-time, upgradable clinical database.
- Assessment of risk factor prevalence and control.
- Evaluation of pharmacological therapies, interventional procedures, care pathways, and treatment delays.
Main Results:
- 1,714 myocardial infarction patients were admitted between 2004 and 2008.
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was utilized in 85% of STEMI cases.
- Door-to-balloon times exceeded 90 minutes in only 17% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Quality indicators are valuable tools for managing myocardial infarction.
- Enhancing pre-hospital diagnosis and emergency medical services (EMS) integration can shorten treatment times.
- Local healthcare networks improve STEMI patient outcomes.
Aim:
Adherence to evidence based guidelines, assessed by measuring key indicators, allows to detect, evaluate and improve quality of care. Since 2004 in Carlo Poma Hospital, following the introduction of a network for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management, the authors carried out a clinical database in order to measure quality of care in STEMI patients.
Materials And Methods:
A real time upgradable database was developed, to assess clinical practice in myocardial infarction management. The authors evaluated prevalence and control of risk factors, pharmacological therapies and interventional procedures, pathways and delays to care.
Results:
From 1 February 2004 to 31 January 2008, 1,714 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction were admitted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 85% of STEMI patients. Door to balloon time was greater than 90 min in only 17% of patients, of whom 88% coming from emergency department and 12% transferred by 118.
Conclusion:
In the authors' experience quality indicators proved useful in the management of myocardial infarction. Implementation of 118 and improvement of pre-hospital diagnosis in setting of local network can reduce time to treatment.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:28Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
01:19Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
01:20Angina V: Nursing Management
01:26Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management