Chronic non-ischaemic congestive heart disease and endomyocardial biopsies. Worth the extra?

The diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsies in patients with chronic congestive heart failure of non-ischaemic aetiology remains questionable and, therefore, the use of endomyocardial biopsies under such circumstances is at stake. The present report documents the correlation between the histologic interpretation of endomyocardial biopsies and the corresponding cardiac explants in 13 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation. The biopsy diagnoses in these patients varied from 'compatible with dilated cardiomyopathy' (n = 6) to 'non-conclusive' (n = 4), 'ischaemia' (n = 2) and 'borderline myocarditis' (n = 1). Correlation with the corresponding cardiac explants revealed hypertrophy of myocytes as the leading histologic feature in the majority of cases. Because of the non-specific histopathology of dilated cardiomyopathy, the discrepancy between biopsy diagnoses and the leading explant diagnosis is mostly a matter of semantics. Ischaemia was present at high incidence, but is considered a result of imparied myocardial perfusion rather than the prime mechanism of heart failure. In four cardiac explants myocarditis was encountered, while the corresponding biopsies showed no cellular inflammation. In two, the cellular infiltrates suggested an early state of repair. One heart contained an active and extensive lymphocytic myocarditis. The fourth case showed an eosinophilic myocarditis, most likely acquired after the biopsy was taken. These discrepancies almost certainly relate to the sampling error and the time interval between biopsy and onset of symptoms. The immediate diagnostic yield of the biopsy, in this particular subset of patients, was minimal, particularly with respect to the diagnosis 'myocarditis'. Nevertheless, biopsy diagnoses such as 'compatible with' and 'non-conclusive' do contribute to the final categorization and management of these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)