Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
Why iron? A spin-polarized conceptual density functional theory study on metal-binding specificity of porphyrin
Xin-Tian Feng1, Jian-Guo Yu, Ruo-Zhuang Liu
1Department of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, PR China.
Abstract:
Heme is a key cofactor of hemoproteins in which porphyrin is often found to be preferentially metalated by the iron cation. In our previous work [Feng, X. T.; Yu, J. G.; Lei, M.; Fang, W. H.; Liu, S. B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 13381], conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) descriptors have been applied to understand the metal-binding specificity of porphyrin. We found that the iron-porphyrin complex significantly differs in many aspects from porphyrin complexes with other metal cations except Ru, for which similar behaviors for the reactivity descriptors were discovered. In this study, we employ the spin-polarized version of CDFT to investigate the reactivity for a series of (pyridine)(n)-M(ll)-porphyrin complexes-where M = Mg, Ca, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ru, and Cd, and n = 0, 1, and 2-to further appreciate the metal-binding specificity of porphyrin. Both global and local descriptors were examined within this framework. We found that, within the spin resolution, not only chemical reactivity descriptors from CDFT of the iron complex are markedly different from that of other metal complexes, but we also discovered substantial differences in reactivity descriptors between Fe and Ru complexes. These results confirm that spin properties play a highly important role in physiological functions of hemoproteins. Quantitative reactivity relationships have been revealed between global and local spin-polarized reactivity descriptors. These results contribute to our better understanding of the metal binding specificity and reactivity for heme-containing enzymes and other metalloproteins alike.
More Related Videos
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
06:31Preparation of SNS Cobalt(II) Pincer Model Complexes of Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Published on: March 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...