Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Measuring the Stiffness of Ex Vivo Mouse Aortas Using Atomic Force Microscopy
Published on: October 19, 2016
Hypertrophic remodeling and increased arterial stiffness in patients with intracranial aneurysms
David Maltete1, Jeremy Bellien, Lucie Cabrejo
1Department of Neurology, CHU-Hopitaux de Rouen & Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U644, Institut Federatif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides (IFRMP) 23, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, France.
Objective:
Because an underlying arteriopathy might contribute to the development of intracranial aneurysms (IAs), we assessed the elastic properties of proximal conduit arteries in patients with IA.
Methods:
In 27 patients with previous ruptured IA and 27 control subjects matched for age, gender and BMI, we determined arterial pressure, internal diameter, intima-media thickness (IMT), circumferential wall stress (CWS) and elastic modulus (wall stiffness) in common carotid arteries using applanation tonometry and echotracking. Moreover, carotid augmentation index (AIx, arterial wave reflections) and carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV, aortic stiffness) were assessed.
Results:
Compared with controls, patients with IA exhibited higher brachial and carotid systolic and diastolic blood pressures, with similar brachial but higher carotid artery pulse pressure (35 + or - 6mm Hg vs. 41 + or - 8mm Hg, P=0.014). Moreover, patients have higher PWV (7.8 + or - 1.2ms(-1) vs. 8.3 + or - 1.1ms(-1), P=0.048) and AIx (15.8 + or - 10.8% vs. 21.1 + or - 8.5%, P<0.001) which contributes to increase carotid blood pressures. Furthermore, carotid IMT was higher in patients (546 + or - 64 microm vs. 642 + or - 70 microm, P<0.001) without difference in diameter suggesting an adaptive hypertrophy. However, patients display a lower CWS (61.6 + or - 9.2 kPa vs. 56.9 + or - 10.3 kPa, P=0.007) and no correlation between IMT and pulse pressure (r=0.152, P=NS) in contrast to controls (r=0.539, P<0.001) showing the contribution of a pressure-independent process. Finally, despite this lesser CWS, elastic modulus was increased in patients (310 + or - 105 kPa vs. 383 + or - 174 kPa, P=0.026).
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that patients with IA display a particular carotid artery phenotype with an exaggerated hypertrophic remodeling and altered elastic properties. Thus, a systemic arteriopathy might contribute, together with the arterial wall fatiguing effect of the increased pulsatile stress, to the pathogenesis of IA.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
