Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Re-establishing Confidence in Confidence Intervals: An Evaluation of Recent Practices in Sport Injury Epidemiology.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

The risk of subsequent concussion in adolescent ice hockey players with ≥2 concussions.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same author

Comparing variable selection and model averaging methods for logistic regression.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Early Detection Intervals for Evaluating Event-Based Surveillance System: Reference Dataset Development Study.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2026
Same author

Bringing Age Back In: Accounting for Population Age Distribution in Forecasting Migration.

Demography·2026
Same author

Bayesian Projection of Extant Refugee and Asylum Seeker Populations.

Demography·2025
Same journal

Symmetric Directional False Discovery Rate Control.

Statistical methodology·2017
Same journal

Latent Class Analysis of Incomplete Data via an Entropy-Based Criterion.

Statistical methodology·2016
Same journal

Incorporating auxiliary information for improved prediction using combination of kernel machines.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A default prior distribution for contingency tables with dependent factor levels.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A note about the identifiability of causal effect estimates in randomized trials with non-compliance.

Statistical methodology·2014
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Inference from Multiple Imputation for Missing Data Using Mixtures of Normals.

Russell J Steele1, Naisyin Wang, Adrian E Raftery

  • 1McGill University.

Statistical Methodology
|May 11, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standard multiple imputation methods can produce overly wide and unstable confidence intervals, especially with few datasets. New methods using mixtures of normals and improper imputation offer narrower, more stable results for missing data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Standard multiple imputation methods, particularly Rubin's t-method, face challenges with confidence interval width and stability.
  • These issues are exacerbated when the number of imputed datasets is small, common in data sharing scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of standard multiple imputation methods for missing data.
  • To propose and evaluate alternative imputation techniques for improved confidence interval precision and inference stability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized mixtures of normals as an alternative to Rubin's t-method for confidence intervals.
  • Examined the performance of improper imputation methods compared to generating draws from the true posterior distribution.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods yielded narrower confidence intervals compared to standard approaches.
  • Inferences were more stable, particularly with a small number of imputed datasets or non-normal posterior distributions.
  • Simulation studies and real-world data analysis (health-related quality of life) supported the findings.

Conclusions:

  • Mixtures of normals and improper imputation methods offer a viable alternative to standard multiple imputation.
  • These methods enhance the precision and stability of statistical inferences from incomplete datasets.
  • The MImix R package provides accessible implementation of these advanced techniques.