Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters
Chantal Van Ongeval1, Andre Van Steen, Gretel Vande Putte
1Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. chantal.vanongeval@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Objective:
To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM).
Methods:
A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU).
Results:
The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference.
Conclusion:
DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.
