Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Electrocardiogram

Electrocardiogram

An electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) is a critical diagnostic tool that records the electrical signals produced by the heart during each heartbeat. This recording is achieved through electrodes placed strategically on the arms, legs, and chest. The electrocardiograph amplifies these signals and produces 12 distinct tracings, offering a comprehensive understanding of the heart's electrical activity.
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and the T...

Cardiac Action Potential

Cardiac Action Potential

Cardiac action potentials are essential for proper heart function, enabling the rhythmic contractions needed for adequate blood circulation. Nodal cells and Purkinje fibers, specialized for electrical conduction, generate these action potentials.
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials

Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm

Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm

The normal cardiac rhythm is a synchronized electrical activity that facilitates the regular and coordinated contraction of the heart muscle. This process is essential for efficient blood circulation throughout the body. The fundamental elements involved in establishing and maintaining this rhythm include the unique electrical properties of cardiac muscle cells, the sinoatrial (SA) node's pacemaker function, the specialized conducting system, and the ionic mechanisms underlying each phase of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Line of block: A simple pacing maneuver to distinguish AV nodal from accessory pathway ventriculoatrial conduction.

Heart rhythm·2026

Same author

Long-term all-cause mortality and hospitalizations after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2025

Same author

Macro-re-entry atrial flutter involving the caval side of a persistent Eustachian valve.

HeartRhythm case reports·2025

Same author

The impact of common and rare genetic variants on bradyarrhythmia development.

Nature genetics·2025

Same author

Narrow complex tachycardia with alternating atrial activation: What is the mechanism?

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2024

Same author

Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies Reveals Genetic Mechanisms of Supraventricular Arrhythmias.

Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Electrocardiogram Recordings in Anesthetized Mice using Lead II

Electrocardiogram Recordings in Anesthetized Mice using Lead II

Published on: June 20, 2020

Repolarization dynamics during exercise discriminate between LQT1 and LQT2 genotypes.

Raymond W Sy¹, Ishvinder S Chattha, George J Klein

¹Division of Cardiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

|May 12, 2010

Summary

Long-QT Syndrome (LQTS) patients exhibit genotype-specific repolarization changes during exercise. LQT1 and LQT2 genotypes show distinct QTc prolongation patterns, highlighting the importance of genotype in managing LQTS during physical activity.

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2^R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Published on: December 22, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Electrocardiogram Recordings in Anesthetized Mice using Lead II

Electrocardiogram Recordings in Anesthetized Mice using Lead II

Published on: June 20, 2020

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Dual-Dye Optical Mapping of Hearts from RyR2^R2474S Knock-In Mice of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Published on: December 22, 2023

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Genetics
Exercise Physiology

Background:

Exercise can affect cardiac repolarization dynamics in patients with Long-QT Syndrome (LQTS).
Patient genotype is a potential influencing factor on these repolarization changes during exercise.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically characterize repolarization dynamics during exercise in LQTS patients.
To investigate the specific influence of genotype on these exercise-induced repolarization changes.

Main Methods:

Study included three groups: LQT1, LQT2, and normal controls (25 patients each).
QTc interval was measured during bicycle exercise testing.
QTc dynamics were compared across the three groups.

Main Results:

LQTS patients showed greater QTc prolongation during exercise compared to controls (LQT1: 80 ± 47 ms, LQT2: 64 ± 41 ms).
Significant differences in QTc prolongation were observed between LQT1 and LQT2 patients at heart rates ≥ 60% of maximum.
LQT1 patients displayed progressive QTc prolongation at higher heart rates, while LQT2 patients showed maximum prolongation at submaximal heart rates.

Conclusions:

Reduced repolarization reserve in LQTS is specific to both genotype and heart rate.
Genotype significantly influences the response of QTc interval to exercise in LQTS patients.