Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

10:10
Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
Published on: February 15, 2022
Single-session vs multiple-session pattern scanning laser panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic
Mahiul M K Muqit1, George R Marcellino, David B Henson
1University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M139WH, England.
Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|May 12, 2010
Summary
Single-session panretinal photocoagulation (SS-PRP) using Pascal laser is as effective as multiple-session PRP (MS-PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. SS-PRP offers significantly shorter treatment times without adverse outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment
- Laser Therapy
Background:
- Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a severe complication of diabetes.
- Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is a standard treatment for PDR.
- Traditional PRP involves multiple sessions, increasing patient burden and treatment time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of single-session panretinal photocoagulation (SS-PRP) with multispot laser (Pascal) versus multiple-session, single-spot PRP (MS-PRP).
- To evaluate treatment time and clinical outcomes in patients with PDR.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, randomized clinical trial involving 40 eyes with PDR.
- Treatment involved 1500 burns with a 400-µm spot size, delivered either as 20-millisecond SS-PRP or 100-millisecond MS-PRP over 3 sessions.
- Outcomes measured included visual acuity, central subfield retinal thickness (CRT), and visual fields at baseline and 4 and 12 weeks.
Main Results:
- SS-PRP showed no significant increase in CRT, unlike MS-PRP which had a significant increase (20-22 µm).
- Mean deviation in visual fields improved significantly with SS-PRP after 4 weeks.
- Positive PDR treatment effect was observed in 74% of SS-PRP eyes vs. 53% of MS-PRP eyes.
- Mean treatment time for SS-PRP was 5 minutes, significantly shorter than MS-PRP (59 minutes).
Conclusions:
- Twenty-millisecond Pascal SS-PRP is a safe and rapid alternative for PDR treatment.
- SS-PRP demonstrates comparable efficacy to conventional MS-PRP with significantly reduced treatment duration.
- No adverse outcomes related to CRT, visual acuity, or visual fields were noted at 12 weeks post-treatment.