Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness
Sarah L Desmarais1, J Don Read
1University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. sdesmarais@bcs.usf.edu
Abstract:
Surveys typically characterize lay knowledge of eyewitness factors as low and highly variable. However, there are notable differences across methodologies, samples, and individual factors. To examine these differences systematically, we took a meta-analytic approach to reviewing the findings of 23 surveys assessing lay knowledge of eyewitness issues. Our analyses examined the beliefs of 4,669 respondents. Overall, respondents correctly agreed with survey items approximately two-thirds of the time. Results revealed significant differences in performance as a function of variable type, question format, and over time. We found few differences as a function of sample type, publication status, or jurisdiction. Although performance varied, a majority of lay respondents achieved "correct" consensus for as many as 11 of the 16 items included in this review.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Hindsight Biases
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Confirmation Biases
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
First Impression

