Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reexamining the Relationship Between Stereopsis and Motion Parallax.

Annual review of vision scienceยท2026
Same author

Conflicting ordinal and metric depth information interferes with depth matching.

Journal of visionยท2026
Same author

Contributions of headset IPD fit, vection and sway to cybersickness during head mounted display based virtual reality.

Applied ergonomicsยท2026
Same author

Differences in perceived travel distance from central versus peripheral optic flow are the same when standing and walking.

PloS oneยท2026
Same author

Depth Cue Conflicts Between Real and Virtual Objects Disrupt Visually-Guided Reaching in Augmented Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphicsยท2026
Same author

Axes of self-motion and object motion shape how we perceive world-relative motion.

Scientific reportsยท2026
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perceptionยท2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perceptionยท2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perceptionยท2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perceptionยท2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perceptionยท2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perceptionยท2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Perceptual artifacts in random-dot stereograms.

Inna Tsirlin1, Laurie M Wilcox, Robert S Allison

  • 1Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada. itsirlin@yorku.ca

Perception
|May 15, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Perceptual artifacts in stereograms, like disparity noise, disrupt the perception of transparent surfaces. Increasing element density worsens these artifacts, hindering stereotransparency. Techniques to prevent these issues are discussed.

More Related Videos

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Computer vision

Background:

  • Random-dot stereograms (RDS) are crucial for studying stereoscopic vision.
  • Stereotransparency perception relies on segregating overlaid surfaces based on binocular disparity.
  • Steep disparity gradients can introduce perceptual artifacts similar to noise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how unrestricted element positioning in RDS with steep disparity gradients affects stereotransparency.
  • To identify the nature of perceptual artifacts and their impact on surface segregation.
  • To explore methods for mitigating these artifacts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized random-dot stereograms with varying element densities and steep disparity gradients.
  • Presented stimuli to observers to assess perception of stereotransparency and surface segregation.
  • Analyzed the relationship between element positioning, disparity gradients, and artifact formation.

Main Results:

  • Unrestricted element positioning creates artifacts resembling disparity noise, particularly with steep gradients.
  • These artifacts significantly impair the segregation of overlaid surfaces in stereo-transparent displays.
  • The disruptive effect intensifies with increased overall element density in the stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual artifacts arising from element positioning in stereograms with steep disparity gradients are a significant barrier to stereotransparency.
  • These artifacts disrupt the fundamental process of surface segregation, impacting depth perception.
  • Understanding the origin of these artifacts is key to developing strategies for improved stereoscopic display design.