Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Design of a Biocompatible Drug-Eluting Tracheal Stent in Mice with Laryngotracheal Stenosis
Published on: January 21, 2020
Sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with chronic renal insufficiency
Asmir I Syed1, Itsik Ben-Dor, Sara D Collins
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Insights
Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) show similar outcomes for patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) undergoing coronary intervention. Both stent types demonstrated acceptable stent thrombosis rates, but high rates of major adverse cardiac events persist.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) increases risks of restenosis and stent thrombosis.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are preferred over bare metal stents (BMS) in CRI patients to reduce restenosis.
- Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in CRI patients is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of SES versus PES implantation in patients with CRI undergoing coronary intervention.
- To evaluate differences in restenosis, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between SES and PES in this high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 570 patients with CRI who received either SES (346) or PES (224).
- Clinical events were tracked for up to 1 year post-intervention.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the SES and PES groups, including covariate adjustment.
Main Results:
- Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between SES and PES groups.
- Overall rates of MACE and stent thrombosis were comparable.
- The PES group showed lower revascularization rates, but this difference was not significant after covariate adjustment. The number of diseased vessels was the strongest predictor of death and MACE.
Conclusions:
- Both SES and PES provide similar repeat revascularization rates and acceptable stent thrombosis rates in patients with CRI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Despite advances in stenting, patients with CRI continue to experience high rates of MACE and death.
- Further research is needed to mitigate long-term adverse outcomes in this vulnerable patient group.
Background:
Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is associated with an increased incidence of restenosis and stent thrombosis. Drug-eluting stents (DES), when compared to bare metal stents (BMS), reduce the incidence of restenosis in these patients. This study aimed to examine whether there are differences in clinical outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with CRI who are subjected to coronary intervention.
Methods:
A cohort of 570 patients with CRI who underwent intervention with DES (346 with SES and 224 with PES) were followed clinically up to 1 year and the clinical events were recorded and compared between groups.
Results:
Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar, with a slightly higher number of diseased vessels in the SES group as compared to the PES group (2.3 +/- 0.9 vs 2.1 +/- 0.9, P = 0.06). The overall rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis were similar. The PES group had lower revascularization rates when compared to the SES group. After covariate adjustment, however, there was no difference seen in target vessel revascularization between stent types (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.3 [0.8-6.2], P = 0.110). The strongest predictor of death and MACE at 1 year was the number of diseased vessels.
Conclusions:
Patients with CRI who undergo PCI with either SES or PES have similar repeat revascularization rates and acceptable stent thrombosis rates, although they continue to have high MACE and death rates.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
