Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principles behind practice. 4. Natural history.

T Nolan1, D J Hewson

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC.

The Medical Journal of Australia
|June 3, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of balance-quality assessment using a modified bathroom scale.

Physiological measurement·2015
Same author

Seroprevalence of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus in Australian blood donors, October - December 2009.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2010
Same author

Influence of elbow position and handle size on maximal grip strength.

The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2009
Same author

Clinical trial experience with prophylactic HPV 6/11/16/18 VLP vaccine in young women from the Asia-Pacific region.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2008
Same author

Randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of moderate-dose metoclopramide and ondansetron for the prophylactic control of postoperative vomiting in children after tonsillectomy.

British journal of anaesthesia·2007
Same author

Prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

British journal of anaesthesia·2006
Same journal

Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Striving for Racial Equity in Oral Cancer Research: A Case Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Self-Poisoning With Prazosin and Its Off-Label Use in Australia, 2014-2024: Analysis of NSW Poisons Information Centre Data.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Four Urgent Actions for the Rights to Culturally Safe Breastfeeding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Babies to Breastfeed in Neonatal Intensive Care Environments.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

Clinicians should critically evaluate patient disease natural history using key questions. This skill aids in accurate diagnosis and effective patient management, improving clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Clinicians face daily diagnostic and management decisions.
  • Understanding disease natural history is crucial but often underdeveloped.
  • A critical approach to fundamental questions is an acquired skill.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guiding questions for clinicians.
  • To integrate natural history considerations into daily practice.
  • To enhance clinical decision-making regarding patient diagnosis and management.

Main Methods:

  • Proposing a set of critical questions for clinicians to consider.
  • Focusing on evidence evaluation regarding disease consequences and external factors.
  • Emphasizing long-term prospective studies and intervention efficacy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Questions address attribution of illness to external factors.
  • Questions assess potential long latency of exposures.
  • Questions evaluate evidence from prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic questioning enhances understanding of disease natural history.
  • This approach supports more informed clinical judgments.
  • Developing this skill is essential for effective patient care.