Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Assessment of Respiration

Assessment of Respiration

The respiratory system's basic structures and primary functions lay the foundation for nurses' comprehensive respiratory assessments. This assessment includes subjective and objective data to gauge the patient's respiratory health.
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm

Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm

Respiratory Depth
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Solving problems: how does the family physician do it?

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011

Same author

The impact of continuing education on the quality of patient care.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011

Same author

Educating future physicians for Ontario: phase II.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2000

Same author

Educating future physicians for Ontario.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1998

Same author

Network is a verb. The experience of the network of community-oriented educational institutions for health sciences.

Infectious disease clinics of North America·1995

Same author

Identifying depressed and suicidal adolescents in a teen health clinic.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1995

Same journal

Impact of virtual case conferences between primary care clinicians and an interdisciplinary chronic pain clinic.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2026

Same journal

Predictors of high-performing family medicine clinics: Prospective cohort study in Alberta.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2026

Same journal

Vulvar punch biopsy for evaluating vulvar dermatoses in primary care: Procedural guide.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2026

Same journal

Approach to sport-savvy contraceptive counselling for athletes.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Published on: March 12, 2018

A method of evaluating residency training programs.

J T Goodman, V R Neufeld

Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien

|May 15, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a structured approach for residency program reviews, emphasizing a fact-finding role for reviewers and clear communication. This method ensures an unbiased perspective for effective program evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Published on: March 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Program Evaluation
Academic Medicine

Background:

Residency program reviews are crucial for maintaining educational standards.
Previous review methods may lack objectivity or clear communication protocols.
McMaster University has conducted multiple program reviews, providing a basis for methodological refinement.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe a refined methodology for conducting residency program reviews.
To highlight key components that enhance the objectivity and effectiveness of program reviews.
To share practical insights from the application of this method in a university setting.

Main Methods:

The review process adopts a fact-finding stance, avoiding a judgmental role for the review team.
Direct and consistent communication is established with the program director at the review's commencement and conclusion.
Reviewers are selected from within the university but external to the specific program under review to ensure impartiality.

Main Results:

The described method facilitates a comprehensive and objective assessment of residency programs.
Direct communication ensures alignment and clarity between the review team and program leadership.
Internal yet external reviewers offer a balanced perspective, leveraging institutional knowledge without direct program involvement.

Conclusions:

This fact-finding, communication-focused, and internally-external review model offers a robust framework for residency program evaluation.
The methodology promotes a constructive and unbiased review process.
Implementation of this approach can lead to improved residency program quality and outcomes.