Loading and knee alignment have significant influence on cartilage MRI T2 in porcine knee joints

Physiological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under loading or knee malalignment conditions has not been thoroughly investigated. We assessed the influence of static loading and knee alignment on T2 (transverse relaxation time) mapping of the knee femoral cartilage of porcine knee joints using a non-metallic pressure device.

Ten porcine knee joints were harvested en bloc with intact capsules and surrounding muscles and imaged using a custom-made pressure device and 3.0-T MRI system. Sagittal T2 maps were obtained (1) at knee neutral alignment without external loading (no loading), (2) under mechanical compression of 140 N (neutral loading), and (3) under the same loading conditions as in (2) with the knee at 10 degrees varus alignment (varus loading). T2 values of deep, intermediate, and superficial zones of the medial and lateral femoral cartilages at the weight-bearing area were compared among these conditions using custom-made software. Cartilage contact pressure between the femoral and tibial cartilages, measured by a pressure-sensitive film, was correlated with cartilage T2 measurements.

In the medial cartilage, mean T2 values of the deep, intermediate, and superficial zones decreased by 1.4%, 13.0%, and 6.0% under neutral loading. They further decreased by 4.3%, 19.3%, and 17.2% under varus loading compared to no loading. In the lateral cartilage, these mean T2 values decreased by 3.9%, 7.7%, and 4.2% under neutral loading, but increased by 1.6%, 9.6%, and 7.2% under varus loading. There was a significant decrease in T2 values in the intermediate zone of the medial cartilage under both neutral and varus loading, and in the superficial zone of the medial cartilage under varus loading (P<0.05). Total contact pressure values under neutral loading and varus loading conditions significantly correlated with T2 values in the superficial and intermediate zones of the medial cartilages.

The response of T2 to change in static loading or alignment varied between the medial and lateral cartilages, and among the deep, intermediate, and superficial zones. These T2 changes were significantly related to the contact pressure measurements. Our results indicate that T2 mapping under loading allows non-invasive, biomechanical assessment of site-specific stress distribution in the cartilage.