Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: July 19, 2019
Comparison of the clinical diagnosis and subsequent autopsy findings in medical malpractice
Isil Pakis1, Oguz Polat, Nesime Yayci
1Council of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Istanbul, Turkey. isilpakis@yahoo.com
Abstract:
The rate of diagnostic error has not declined over the last 30 years despite the improvement in diagnosis methods. Today, the probability to encounter a major diagnostic change in autopsy is still high. The special autopsy that provides clinicians the necessary feedback is performed seldom in our country. This study has been started upon the claim that the malpractice cases in scope of forensic cases could be a very useful database. About 525 cases with faulty medical application that resulted in death have been encountered according to the cases that have been sent to the Forensic Medical Institution, which has been the consultative authority of the Ministry of Justice between the years 2001 and 2005. Among these, 375 cases on which autopsies have been conducted are included in the scope of the study. The cases with and without major diagnostic changes have been compared in aspects of gender, age groups, and period spent in health units. When the concordance between autopsy and clinical diagnosis for the 375 cases that were included in the study is examined, it can be seen that clinical diagnosis is verified with autopsy in 49.1% of the cases whereas neither autopsy nor clinical diagnosis was encountered in 14.7% of them. The diseases where diagnostic faults are mostly encountered are ruptured aortic aneurysm, myocardial infarction and pneumonia. The majority of the cases without a clinical diagnosis comprises of complications that occur after operations. In the study, considerable major diagnostic changes were realized after autopsy, which shows that autopsy has an important place in Turkey in spite of the improved methods of diagnosis. Also, in the cases with major diagnostic changes, the medical malpractice rate was high. This shows that autopsy is influential in revealing medical malpractice failures. In the study, we found out that the number of autopsies was high in the cases with a malpractice claim. We aim to increase this number. We are sure that such increment would increase decision accuracy.
Insights
Diagnostic errors persist despite advanced methods, with autopsies revealing significant discrepancies and highlighting medical malpractice. Increasing autopsy rates can improve diagnostic accuracy in forensic cases.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Pathology
- Medical Error Analysis
Background:
- Diagnostic error rates remain high despite advancements in medical diagnosis.
- Autopsies are crucial for verifying clinical diagnoses and providing essential feedback, yet are infrequently performed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of forensic malpractice cases as a database for diagnostic error analysis.
- To assess the concordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses and identify common causes of diagnostic failure.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 375 death cases with faulty medical applications between 2001-2005.
- Comparison of cases with and without major diagnostic changes based on demographics and healthcare duration.
- Examination of concordance between clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings.
Main Results:
- Autopsy verified clinical diagnosis in only 49.1% of cases; 14.7% lacked both diagnoses.
- Ruptured aortic aneurysm, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia were diseases with frequent diagnostic errors.
- Post-operative complications comprised the majority of cases lacking clinical diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- Autopsy remains vital in Turkey for identifying diagnostic discrepancies, even with improved diagnostic tools.
- Major diagnostic changes identified post-autopsy were linked to a high rate of medical malpractice.
- Increasing the number of autopsies, particularly in malpractice claims, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Torts I
Intentional...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

