Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Probability in Statistics

Probability in Statistics

Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Faces of Generative AI: Predictors of FACES.

Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery·2026

Same author

Virtually the same? A comparison between in-person and virtual mock jury deliberations.

Law and human behavior·2026

Same author

A New Look at Vaccination Behaviors and Intentions: The Case of Influenza.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Dual-systems and Fuzzy-trace Theory Predictions of COVID-19 Risk Taking in Young Adults.

Decision (Washington, D.C.)·2025

Same author

Repeated thyroid function evaluations in the dog: a retrospective study of 8,309 dogs.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2025

Same author

Developmental change and invariance in verbatim and gist memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications of the dual-retrieval model.

Psychology and aging·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Assessing semantic coherence and logical fallacies in joint probability estimates.

Christopher R Wolfe¹, Valerie F Reyna

¹Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.

Behavior Research Methods

|May 19, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a semantic coherence technique to assess joint probability estimates. An automated method using Excel formulae identifies six patterns in probability estimations, aiding research on problem wording and individual differences.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Probability Theory
Decision Science

Background:

Assessing the semantic coherence of joint probability estimates is crucial for understanding human reasoning.
The relationship between probability estimates P(A), P(B), P(A and B), and P(A or B) must align with set theory principles.
A vast number of probability estimate permutations exist, posing a challenge for analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a method for evaluating the semantic coherence of joint probability estimates.
To reduce the complex problem space of probability estimates into theoretically meaningful patterns.
To provide researchers with a tool to analyze the impact of various factors on probability estimation.

Main Methods:

Defined semantic coherence based on the consistency between quantitative probability estimates and set relationships.
Identified six theoretically meaningful patterns: logically fallacious, identical sets, mutually exclusive sets, subsets, overlapping sets, and inconsistent overlapping sets.
Automated the pattern determination process using Excel spreadsheet formulae.

Main Results:

The study successfully reduced the problem space of joint probability estimates to six distinct patterns.
An automated method using Excel formulae was developed to classify probability estimates into these patterns.
The semantic coherence technique provides a framework for analyzing probability estimation.

Conclusions:

The semantic coherence technique offers a systematic approach to evaluating joint probability estimates.
Automated analysis via Excel formulae facilitates the examination of semantic coherence in research.
This method can be applied to study the effects of problem wording, individual differences, and experimental manipulations on probability estimation.