Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-sectional analysis of male versus female flourishing among 202,898 participants across 22 countries on 73 variables in the global flourishing study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Spirituality and Harmful or Hazardous Alcohol and Other Drug Use: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Love of neighbor assessment: validity, reliability, and a template for measurement.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Childhood experiences and adult self-rated physical health in 22 countries.

BMC global and public health·2026
Same author

Mental illness, mental health, and mental well-being.

Npj mental health research·2026
Same author

Adolescence in social context: Longitudinal associations of 15 social factors with health and well-being.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.

Tyler J VanderWeele1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|May 19, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Researchers can now assess bias in direct and indirect effect estimates from mediation analysis. This study provides formulas to quantify confounding effects in exposure-mediator and mediator-outcome relationships.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Mediation analysis decomposes total effect into direct and indirect components.
  • Estimates of direct and indirect effects can be biased by unmeasured confounding.
  • Confounding of the mediator-outcome relationship is a common issue in observational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide methods for sensitivity analysis of mediation effects.
  • To develop formulas for quantifying bias in direct and indirect effects due to confounding.
  • To assess the impact of unmeasured mediator-outcome confounders on mediation analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of bias formulas for direct and indirect effects.
  • Formulas account for confounding in both exposure-mediator and mediator-outcome relationships.
  • Application of formulas under simplifying assumptions for practical use.

Main Results:

  • Formulas quantify the potential bias in mediation analysis estimates.
  • Sensitivity analysis can be performed even with unmeasured confounders.
  • Bias is dependent on the strength of the confounding and its association with the mediator and outcome.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers can evaluate the robustness of their mediation findings.
  • The provided formulas facilitate sensitivity analyses for mediator-outcome confounding.
  • This work enhances the reliability of causal effect estimations in complex pathways.