Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
Robust Ligature-Induced Model of Murine Periodontitis for the Evaluation of Oral Neutrophils
Published on: January 21, 2020
Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets
1Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. hbcteam@aol.com
Objective:
To compare the rates of retraction down an archwire of maxillary canine teeth when bracketed with a self-ligating bracket was used on one side and a conventional bracket on the other.
Materials And Methods:
In 43 patients requiring maxillary premolar extraction, a self-ligating bracket (Damon3, SmartClip) was used on the maxillary canine on one side and a conventional bracket (Victory Series) on the other. The teeth were retracted down a 0.018-inch stainless steel archwire, using a medium Sentalloy retraction spring (150 g). The rates of retraction were analyzed using a paired t-test.
Results:
The mean movement per 28 days for the conventional bracket was 1.17 mm. For the Damon bracket it was 0.9 mm and for the SmartClip bracket it was 1.10 mm. The differences between the conventional and self-ligating brackets were statistically significant: paired t-test, SmartClip, P < .0043; Damon3, P < .0001).
Conclusion:
The retraction rate is faster with the conventional bracket, probably because of the narrower bracket width of the self-ligating brackets.
