Colonic ischemia after endovascular exclusion of an aortoiliac aneurysm using an iliac branch device
Giorgos S Sfyroeras1, Stylianos Koutsias, Christos Karathanos
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Thessaly Medical School, Larissa, Greece. gsfyr@yahoo.gr
Insights
This case study highlights colonic ischemia (CI) following endovascular aneurysm repair with an iliac branch device (IBD). Adequate collateral circulation is crucial, especially when the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is excluded.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using iliac branch devices (IBD) is a common treatment for aortoiliac aneurysms.
- Preservation of bilateral iliac artery patency is generally aimed to prevent pelvic ischemia.
Observation:
- A 69-year-old male patient with an aortoiliac aneurysm underwent EVAR with an IBD.
- Postoperatively, the patient developed moderate colonic ischemia (CI) despite patent iliac arteries and a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Findings:
- The patient was treated conservatively for CI and discharged after 15 days with symptom resolution.
- This case suggests that even with patent IMA, exclusion during EVAR can compromise left colon blood supply.
Implications:
- Exclusion of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during endovascular exclusion of aortoiliac aneurysms may lead to colonic ischemia (CI).
- Careful consideration of collateral circulation is essential to prevent CI in patients undergoing EVAR with IBD, particularly when the IMA is involved.
Purpose:
To present the first case of colonic ischemia (CI) after endovascular exclusion of an aortoiliac aneurysm using an iliac branch device (IBD).
Case Report:
A 69-year-old male patient with an abdominal aortic and right common iliac artery aneurysm underwent endovascular repair with an IBD. Completion angiography demonstrated good patency in 2 of the 3 main branches of the right internal iliac artery (IIA) whereas the left IIA patency was preserved. Preoperatively, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was patent. Postoperatively, the patient presented moderate CI. He was treated conservatively and discharged 15 days later with recession of the symptoms.
Conclusion:
Although preservation of bilateral iliac artery patency is considered to diminish the incidence of pelvic ischemia, in case of an exclusion of a patent IMA, collaterals may not be adequate to ensure blood supply to the left colon.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

