Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions01:30

Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

The first step in nursing management of a patient with heart failure involves thoroughly assessing the patient's medical history.Subjective Data: Obtain the patient's medical history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and symptoms like dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea.Objective Data: Conduct a physical examination to identify findings such as jugular vein distention, pulmonary crackles, tachycardia, murmurs, peripheral edema, and vital signs,...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management01:30

Heart Failure V: Medical Management

Medical Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)The primary goals of therapy for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include:Relieving symptomsOptimizing volume statusSupporting oxygenation and ventilationMaintaining cardiac output (CO) and end-organ perfusionIdentifying and addressing the cause of ADHFPreventing complicationsProviding patient education on factors precipitating HF exacerbationPlanning for dischargeOngoing monitoring and assessment...
Heart Failure I: Introduction01:27

Heart Failure I: Introduction

Heart failure refers to a clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional cardiac disorders that prevent the heart from pumping an adequate amount of blood to meet the body's metabolic needs. This condition often arises from myocardial infarction or ischemia, leading to decreased cardiac output, reduced tissue perfusion, impaired gas exchange, fluid volume imbalance, and decreased functional ability.Heart failure can result from disruptions in the mechanisms that regulate cardiac output...
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations01:26

Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations

Heart failure (HF) manifests primarily as dyspnea, fatigue, and fluid retention, resulting in peripheral and pulmonary edema. Symptoms may vary depending on which ventricle is more affected, left or right.Left-Sided Heart FailureAlso known as left ventricular failure, this condition results from the left ventricle's inability to fill or eject sufficient blood into the systemic circulation. It leads to pulmonary congestion, which occurs when the left ventricle fails to eject blood effectively...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology01:29

Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

Systolic Heart Failure and Compensatory MechanismsSystolic heart failure (also termed HFrEF, Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) is the most prevalent type of heart filure. It results in a decreased volume of blood being pumped from the ventricle. The aortic arch and carotid sinuses have baroreceptors that detect reduced blood pressure, triggering the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) to release epinephrine and norepinephrine. Initially, this response aims to boost heart rate and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physical Frailty, Self-Care Behaviors, and 6-Month Clinical Outcomes Among Adults With Heart Failure.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Predictors of self-care among informal caregivers of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional study.

Annals of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Measurement equivalence of the self-care of chronic illness inventory across time: longitudinal structural equation models.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Beyond universality: confronting nursing theories with the realities of chronic care.

Revista latino-americana de enfermagem·2026
Same author

Virtual health coaching to improve self-care among informal caregivers of hospitalized older adults during a transition in care: Randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Supporting Family Caregiver Health in Heart Failure: Longitudinal Associations Between Heart Failure Caregiver Self-Care and Patient Hospitalizations.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
03:47

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients

Published on: July 12, 2024

Developing an instrument to measure heart failure disease management program intensity and complexity.

Barbara Riegel1, Christopher S Lee, Julie Sochalski

  • 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19104-4217, USA. briegel@nursing.upenn.edu <briegel@nursing.upenn.edu>

Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
|May 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary

A new scoring instrument helps standardize the description of heart failure (HF) disease management programs. The Heart Failure Disease Management Scoring Instrument (HF-DMSI) assesses program intensity and complexity, improving comparisons.

More Related Videos

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
07:49

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models

Published on: July 21, 2023

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
03:47

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients

Published on: July 12, 2024

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
07:49

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models

Published on: July 21, 2023

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Comparing heart failure (HF) disease management programs is challenging due to variability in intensity and complexity.
  • A standardized method is needed to objectively describe these programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an instrument for describing the intensity and complexity of HF disease management programs.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted criteria from the American Heart Association (AHA) taxonomy of disease management.
  • Developed the Heart Failure Disease Management Scoring Instrument (HF-DMSI) covering 6 domains.
  • Used hierarchical scoring and an ordinal system to rate intensity and complexity.
  • Assessed content validity against the AHA taxonomy and inter-rater reliability.

Main Results:

  • The HF-DMSI incorporates key domains: recipient, intervention content, delivery personnel, communication method, intensity/complexity, and environment.
  • Inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.918) after refinement.
  • Delivery personnel and communication methods showed the most variability among programs.

Conclusions:

  • The HF-DMSI is a valuable tool for characterizing the intensity and complexity of HF disease management programs.
  • This instrument facilitates more consistent comparisons of different HF management strategies.