Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selective removal of visual working memory items at test.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Selective removal of visual working memory items at test.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Content-Independent Pointers Mediate Working Memory Storage for Both Visual and Verbal Stimuli.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Contributions from Long-Term Memory Explain Superior Visual Working Memory Performance with Meaningful Objects.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Colour blindness adversely impacts face recognition.

Visual cognition·2026
Same journal

Confidence in incomplete visual search.

Visual cognition·2026
Same journal

The Predictive Ability of GBVS Feature Channels on Infants' Fixations of Natural Scenes.

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

Learned relevance of a distracting cue can influence feature interference errors.

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

How Does Mind-Wandering Affect Distractor Suppression?

Visual cognition·2025
Same journal

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Online response-selection and the attentional blink: Multiple-processing channels.

John Serences1, Miranda Scolari, Edward Awh

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Visual Cognition
|September 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The attentional blink (AB) causes interference when identifying targets in quick succession. This study found that response selection impacts letter identification but not face identification, challenging a single bottleneck theory for the AB.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The attentional blink (AB) is a robust interference phenomenon observed when participants identify two targets (T1 and T2) in rapid succession.
  • The AB is traditionally attributed to a central bottleneck in postperceptual processing, affecting working memory consolidation, attentional engagement, or response selection.
  • Recent research suggests the AB may not stem from a unitary bottleneck, with some studies showing reduced or absent interference for specific stimulus types or processing demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of response selection in the attentional blink (AB) for face identification.
  • To test whether the previously observed AB interference for letter identification, induced by response selection, extends to face stimuli.
  • To determine if faces are immune to central interference or if response selection can elicit interference for face targets.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a modified attentional blink (AB) procedure with rapid serial visual presentation of targets.
  • Manipulated the response selection demands for the first target (T1), using either digits or faces.
  • Assessed the identification accuracy of the second target (T2), which consisted of faces, following T1 presentation.

Main Results:

  • Replicated findings that speeded response selection of a digit (T1) significantly interferes with the identification of subsequent letter targets (T2).
  • Found no significant attentional blink (AB) interference when identifying T2 faces following the response selection of a digit T1.
  • Observed robust attentional blink (AB) interference for T2 face identification when a speeded response to a T1 face was required, indicating faces are susceptible to central interference.

Conclusions:

  • Response selection can induce processing limitations characteristic of the attentional blink (AB), but the effect is stimulus-dependent.
  • The identification of faces is not immune to central interference, as demonstrated by the AB effect when response selection is applied to face targets.
  • These findings dispute the existence of a unitary postperceptual capacity limitation underlying the attentional blink (AB), suggesting more complex, stimulus-specific mechanisms.