Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Sex disparities in self-reported physical functioning: true differences, reporting bias, or incomplete adjustment for
Grant H Louie1, Michael M Ward
1Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Older women report similar physical functioning limitations as men when accounting for age, health, and physical abilities. This finding suggests that sex disparities in self-reported physical functioning may be explained by other factors.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Sex disparities in self-reported physical functioning are common in older adults.
- Potential confounding factors and reporting bias may influence these disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if sex differences in self-reported physical functioning persist after adjusting for confounding factors.
- To examine potential reporting biases between sexes.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional survey of 5,396 U.S. noninstitutionalized older adults (aged 60+).
- Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
- Assessed self-reported limitations in 11 physical functions.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted analyses showed women reporting more limitations in 10 of 11 tasks.
- After multivariate adjustment, women reported more limitations only in lifting/carrying 10 pounds (aOR=2.03).
- No evidence of systematic reporting differences for this specific limitation.
Conclusions:
- Older women and men exhibit similar self-reported physical functioning limitations when matched for age, health status, and physical abilities.
- The initial disparities observed are largely explained by factors other than sex alone.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

