Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A methodological assessment of randomization integrity in alteplase for acute ischemic stroke individual patient data meta-analyses.

PloS one·2025

Same author

The fundamentals of multiplicity adjustment in biostatistics.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2025

Same author

Steady-state statistical properties and implementation of randomization designs with maximum tolerated imbalance restriction for two-arm equal allocation clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2024

Same author

On "Re-randomization tests as sensitivity analyses to confirm immunological noninferiority of an investigational vaccine: Case study" by Luca Grassano et al. (2023, Pharmaceutical Statistics).

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024

Same author

The Impact of Community Generated PPE During the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic in Southeast Alabama and Gulfport Mississippi.

Frontiers in health services·2023

Same author

A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials.

BMC medical research methodology·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Sensitivity designs for preventing bias replication in randomized clinical trials.

Vance W Berger¹, William C Grant, Laura F Vazquez

¹NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-7354, USA. bergerv@mail.nih.gov

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

|May 22, 2010

Summary

Employing sensitivity designs in clinical trials, by varying randomization and endpoints, enhances result reliability. This approach makes findings more robust against potential biases, strengthening treatment effect attribution.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Clinical Trial Design
Biostatistics
Epidemiology

Background:

Sensitivity analyses are common post-trial to assess assumption impact.
Standard trial protocols often lead to uniform vulnerability to biases across all sites.

Purpose of the Study:

To advocate for the use of sensitivity designs during trial planning.
To enhance the robustness and reliability of clinical trial results.

Main Methods:

Varying design features such as randomization methods, follow-up duration, and endpoint selection across trial centers or programs.
Implementing diverse protocols to mitigate the impact of single-point biases.

Main Results:

Sensitivity designs allow for varied biases across sites, making results less susceptible to a single flaw.
If a significant result is found, it is more plausibly attributed to treatment effects rather than a sole bias.

Conclusions:

Sensitivity designs offer comparable benefits to sensitivity analyses by proactively addressing potential biases.
This proactive approach increases the credibility and robustness of clinical trial findings.