[Implementation and evaluation of a program of prevention against abuse in at risk infants]

S Dubois1, N Job-Spira, M Lamour

  • 1l'Unité de recherche INSERM U292, Hôpital de Bicêtre.

Archives Francaises De Pediatrie
|March 1, 1991
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluated new prevention methods for at-risk infants. While interventions improved mother-infant interactions, they did not significantly impact growth or development, highlighting research challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Child Psychiatry
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Infants with medico-psychosocial risk factors require effective prevention strategies for abuse.
  • Early mother-infant interactions are crucial for healthy child development.
  • Existing surveillance methods may not adequately address high-risk infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate original modes of prevention for infants identified with medico-psychosocial high risk factors.
  • To assess the impact of specific prevention interventions on mother-infant interactions and child development.
  • To analyze the efficacy of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in this population.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving infants selected by risk indicators on health certificates.
  • Comparison of a treated group receiving specific prevention interventions versus a control group receiving classic surveillance.
  • Longitudinal study of mother-infant interactions at 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years, alongside somatic and psychomotor assessments.

Main Results:

  • The intervention group received significantly more actions (mean 7.5) than the control group (mean 1).
  • No significant differences were found between groups in height, weight growth, psychomotor development, or somatic status at 1 year.
  • A better quality of mother-infant interactions was observed in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusions:

  • Specific prevention interventions showed a positive effect on mother-infant interaction quality but did not yield significant improvements in growth or psychomotor development.
  • Challenges in research, including loss to follow-up and group contamination, impacted the study's ability to demonstrate efficacy.
  • Further research is needed to refine prevention strategies and evaluation methods for high-risk infants.