Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Therapeutic strategies in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease
Michael J Zellweger1, Matthias E Pfisterer
1Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, Basel, Switzerland. mzellweger@uhbs.ch
Insights
For chronic stable angina, treatment strategies like intense medical therapy versus immediate revascularization show similar outcomes for death or heart attack in selected patients. Risk factor control is crucial for both approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Debate exists on optimal treatment for chronic stable angina: intense medical therapy with potential revascularization vs. immediate angiography and revascularization.
- Two major trials (COURAGE, BARI 2D) evaluated these strategies in specific patient groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current treatment strategies for chronic stable angina.
- To discuss the strengths and limitations of medical therapy versus revascularization.
- To emphasize the role of ischemia assessment in patient risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Review of findings from large randomized controlled trials (e.g., COURAGE, BARI 2D).
- Analysis of treatment strategies including medical management, angiography, and revascularization.
- Discussion of risk factor control and secondary prevention measures.
Main Results:
- In selected patients with mild/moderate angina and suitable coronary anatomy, no significant difference in death or myocardial infarction was observed between intense medical therapy and immediate revascularization.
- Generalizability of these findings to patients with unknown coronary anatomy remains uncertain.
Conclusions:
- The choice of treatment strategy for chronic stable angina should consider individual patient factors.
- Documenting the extent of myocardial ischemia is vital for appropriate risk stratification.
- An evidence-based algorithm is proposed to guide personalized management decisions.
Abstract:
In chronic stable angina of mild or moderate severity, there is an ongoing debate as to which treatment strategy should be offered to patients: intense medical drug therapy combined with revascularization if medical therapy fails, or direct coronary angiography in view of immediate revascularization in all patients if feasible, both combined with strict risk factor control and secondary prevention. Findings of two large randomized controlled trials, COURAGE and BARI 2D showed that in selected patients with mild to moderate angina and documented coronary disease by coronary angiography suitable for revascularization, there was no difference in death or myocardial infarction between the two strategies. It remains unclear, however, how these findings can be generalized to the broader spectrum of patients with unknown coronary anatomy. This review describes both treatment strategies, their strengths and limitations, and stresses the importance of the documentation of the extent of myocardial ischemia in risk stratifying such patients. Based on the available trial evidence, an algorithm is proposed how to tailor the management strategy to each patient's individual situation.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care