Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Changes in oxygen saturation using two different sedation techniques.

G M Walton1, C A Boyle, P J Thomson

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Turner Dental School, Manchester.

The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization and clinicopathological significance of circulating tumour cells in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

COVID-19 social-distancing measures altered the epidemiology of facial injury: a United Kingdom-Australia comparative study.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Predictors of oropharyngeal cancer survival in Europe.

Oral oncology·2018
Same author

Perspectives on oral squamous cell carcinoma prevention-proliferation, position, progression and prediction.

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology·2018
Same author

The provision of surgical tracheostomies by maxillofacial surgeons in the UK: time for a dedicated tracheostomy team?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2017
Same author

Treatment resistance in potentially malignant disorders-'Nature' or 'Nurture'…?

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology·2017
Same journal

Intralesional corticosteroid injections in single-system Langerhans cell histiocytosis with maxillomandibular involvement: a systematic review.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Obituary: Mr Ian Cliffe Martin.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

In reply to the Letter to Editor regarding "Novel electromagnetic-navigated maxillary repositioning system for Le Fort I osteotomy: preclinical evaluation".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Long-term outcomes after level II/III temporomandibular joint arthroscopy for temporomandibular dysfunction: results from a five-year follow-up study".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: "Novel electromagnetic-navigated maxillary repositioning system for Le Fort I osteotomy: preclinical evaluation".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

AI-powered virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Midazolam sedation alone for third molar removal is safer than combination sedation with nalbuphine. Combination sedation significantly increased the incidence and depth of hypoxia, posing a greater risk to patients.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Oral Surgery
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Sedation is commonly used for dental procedures like third molar removal.
  • Midazolam is a common sedative, but its effects on oxygen saturation need evaluation.
  • Combination sedation techniques may alter patient respiratory status.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence and depth of hypoxia during midazolam sedation versus combination nalbuphine-midazolam sedation for lower third molar removal.
  • To evaluate the safety of different sedation techniques regarding respiratory function.

Main Methods:

  • Pulse oximetry was employed to monitor oxygen saturation levels.
  • Two groups of patients undergoing lower third molar removal were studied: one receiving midazolam alone, the other receiving nalbuphine and midazolam.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hypoxia was assessed based on incidence and depth of oxygen desaturation.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients receiving the combination nalbuphine-midazolam sedation experienced significantly more profound hypoxia.
    • Both the incidence and depth of hypoxia were greater in the combination sedation group compared to midazolam alone.
    • The difference in hypoxia was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions:

    • Combination sedation with nalbuphine and midazolam increases the risk of significant hypoxia during third molar removal.
    • Midazolam monosedation appears to be a safer alternative regarding oxygen saturation.
    • Careful patient monitoring is crucial when using combination sedation techniques.