Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Rapid Mix Preparation of Bioinspired Nanoscale Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications
05:41

Rapid Mix Preparation of Bioinspired Nanoscale Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications

Published on: February 23, 2017

Apatite-formation ability--predictor of "bioactivity"?

Haobo Pan1, Xiaoli Zhao, Brian W Darvell

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, L9-07, Lab Block, 21 Sassoon Rd., Hong Kong.

Acta Biomaterialia
|May 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Apatite formation tests may inaccurately assess implant bioactivity. True bioactivity depends on osteoblast vitality and growth factors, not just solution supersaturation. Rethinking these tests is crucial for understanding material behavior.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bioactive dental materials: Developing, promising, confusing.

JADA foundational science·2026
Same author

Multifunctional spatiotemporally programmed microneedle patches for the reconstruction of antibacterial and immunoregenerative homeostasis in periodontitis therapy.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same author

Bioelectric ink bridge: An electroactive casein bioink for cartilage regeneration by actively restoring the electrophysiological niche.

Biomaterials·2026
Same author

Sea Urchin-Inspired Immuno-Instructive Ionic Flow Drives MSCs-Macrophage Communication to Promote Bone Regeneration.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Targeting adipocyte ESRRA alleviates osteoarthritis via interrupting inter-organelle crosstalk of complement C3-CFD-MAC cascade.

Bone research·2026
Same author

Targeting delayed healing tissues: immune reprogramming of adaptive immune cells by biomaterials.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Apatite formation in vitro is a common proxy for implant bioactivity.
  • This method relies solely on solution supersaturation, neglecting biological factors.
  • Misinterpretation of these tests can lead to flawed conclusions about material performance in vivo.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically re-evaluate the validity of using apatite formation tests to determine implant bioactivity.
  • To highlight the limitations of solution-based assays in reflecting complex biological processes.
  • To propose a more biologically relevant approach for assessing biomaterials.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on bioactivity testing methodologies.
  • Analysis of the biological mechanisms underlying bone regeneration, including osteoblast function and growth factor regulation.

More Related Videos

Analysis of Minerals Produced by hFOB 1.19 and Saos-2 Cells Using Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis
14:55

Analysis of Minerals Produced by hFOB 1.19 and Saos-2 Cells Using Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis

Published on: June 24, 2018

Screening for Thermotoga maritima Membrane-Bound Pyrophosphatase Inhibitors
09:11

Screening for Thermotoga maritima Membrane-Bound Pyrophosphatase Inhibitors

Published on: November 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Rapid Mix Preparation of Bioinspired Nanoscale Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications
05:41

Rapid Mix Preparation of Bioinspired Nanoscale Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications

Published on: February 23, 2017

Analysis of Minerals Produced by hFOB 1.19 and Saos-2 Cells Using Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis
14:55

Analysis of Minerals Produced by hFOB 1.19 and Saos-2 Cells Using Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis

Published on: June 24, 2018

Screening for Thermotoga maritima Membrane-Bound Pyrophosphatase Inhibitors
09:11

Screening for Thermotoga maritima Membrane-Bound Pyrophosphatase Inhibitors

Published on: November 23, 2019

  • Comparison of apatite formation assays with cell-based testing approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Apatite formation is an insufficient indicator of bioactivity due to its independence from biological processes.
    • Implant-released ions can influence osteoblast gene expression, impacting bone resorption and formation.
    • Current in vitro tests may not accurately predict in vivo material behavior.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard apatite formation test provides incomplete information on implant bioactivity.
    • Osteoblast vitality and the regulation of growth factors are critical determinants of bone regeneration.
    • Testing using osteoblasts, in vitro or in vivo, is a more viable approach for assessing biomaterials for bone regeneration.