Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
Bioprinting of Hydrogel Tumor Slices as a 3D Model for Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Published on: September 12, 2025
Validation, revision and extension of the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in a population-based
Saskia A M van de Schans1, Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen, Marten R Nijziel
1Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (IKZ), Eindhoven Cancer Registry, PO box 231, 5600 AE Eindhoven, the Netherlands. research@ikz.nl
Background:
The aim of this study was to validate the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in a population-based cohort and to study the relevance of its revisions.
Design And Methods:
We analyzed data from 178 unselected patients with stage III or IV mantle cell lymphoma, registered between 1994 and 2006 in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Follow-up was completed up to January 1(st), 2008. Multiple imputations for missing covariates were used. Validity was assessed by comparing observed survival in our cohort with predicted survival according to the original Mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index. A revised model was constructed with Cox regression analysis. Discrimination was assessed by a concordance statistic ('c').
Results:
The original Mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index could stratify our cohort into three distinct risk groups based on Eastern Cooperative Group performance status, white blood cell count, lactate dehydrogenase level, and age, with the discrimination being nearly as good as in the original cohort (c 0.65 versus 0.63). A modified model including performance status in five categories (0/1/2/3/4) instead of two (0-1/2-4), the presence of B-symptoms (yes/no) and sex (male/female) in addition to the original variables resulted in a better prognostic index (c 0.75).
Conclusions:
The Mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index is a valid tool for risk stratification, comparison of prognosis, and treatment decisions in an unselected Dutch population-based setting. Although the index can be significantly improved, external validation on an independent data set is warranted before broad application of the modified instrument could be recommended.