Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical issues in carcinogenic risk assessment.

H E Rockette1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Effect of early or delayed insertion of tympanostomy tubes for persistent otitis media on developmental outcomes at the age of three years.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Statistical test to assess rank-order imaging studies.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Empiric assessment of parameters that affect the design of multireader receiver operating characteristic studies.

Academic radiology·2000
Same author

Past history of otitis media and balance in four-year-old children.

The Laryngoscope·2000
Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews analytical methods for assessing carcinogenic risk from environmental and occupational exposures. It highlights areas for improving risk interpretation, including meta-analysis and exposure assessment, to guide future research.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Occupational Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Analytical methods have advanced for assessing carcinogenic risk from occupational and environmental agents.
  • Statistical considerations accompany method development, yet gaps remain in optimal risk interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss key statistical issues in analytical methods for carcinogenic risk assessment.
  • To suggest productive areas for future research to enhance the interpretation of risk estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of statistical challenges in carcinogenic risk assessment.
  • Exploration of methods for combining multiple studies (meta-analysis).
  • Assessment of statistical model robustness and selection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified critical areas for statistical improvement in risk assessment methods.
  • Highlighted the impact of exposure measures on dose-response relationships.
  • Emphasized the need for enhanced surveillance methodology.

Conclusions:

  • Further statistical research is needed to refine analytical methods for carcinogenic risk.
  • Improved methods will lead to more accurate interpretations of health risks from environmental and occupational exposures.