Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Misunderstood responses in police interrogation rooms
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
|May 28, 2010
Summary
Disability workers can now communicate essential characteristics to law enforcement in various settings. This improved communication aims to enhance safety, security, and justice for individuals with disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Law Enforcement Training
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Historically, communication between disability workers and law officials regarding specific characteristics has been limited.
- The evolution from an initial list of eight traits to twenty traits signifies a growing understanding and need for detailed communication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the expanded opportunities for disability workers to communicate critical information to law enforcement.
- To emphasize the positive impact of this enhanced communication on the safety and justice for individuals with disabilities.
Main Methods:
- The study identifies multiple interaction points between disability workers and law officials.
- These include investigations, police training, roll-call sessions, court testimonies, and community conferences.
Main Results:
- Disability workers have diverse avenues to engage with law enforcement regarding individuals' characteristics.
- The expansion of recognized traits provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding and support.
Conclusions:
- Increased and varied communication channels facilitate better understanding and support for individuals with disabilities within the justice system.
- The ultimate goal is to ensure greater safety, security, and justice for this population.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Understanding Deception
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Eyewitness Memory
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

